305
submitted 9 months ago by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

TheGuardian.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago

I think the thing with the word "antisemitism" is that it has been so thoroughly associated with nazis that it has become a weapon in itself. People wrestle over what it means because most people internalized "antisemites are bad". If you can get "antisemite" associated with your enemy, you win.

It shouldn't be a thing really. In a good faith conversation not between linguists, people should just clarify what they mean.

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

I just can't agree with this line of reasoning. It's so close to all the violent white supremacists who whine about how unfair and damaging it is to be called racist.

Hatred against jews has uniquely strong roots in western cultures that merits a specific term - every right wing conspiracy theory is still just reheated blood libel and protocols of the elders of zion. It's deserving of a powerfully negative term.

If your opponent in an argument is antisemitic, you should win. Of course, anti-zionism is not antisemitism and criticism of the state of israel is not antisemitism.

Misuse of the term is something to be challenged through discourse, rather than scrapping the term, I think.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 5 points 9 months ago

Oh, you are misunderstanding me. Antisemitism is a fine word in itself, what I'm arguing against is not the word antisemite itself. I am arguing against the pointless arguments over what the word means, the "what you really mean" or the "you are using the wrong word because technically it shouldn't mean what people use it for" arguments.

And I also think it's an okay argument to have, if society really has long-held conflicting beliefs over what a word means. Like the word "socialist". It makes sense to argue over what that means. But trying to redefine "antisemite" as someone who hates Jews and Arabs as well is stupid, since in usage it was specifically used for people hating Jews.

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

Ah! My apologies.

the “you are using the wrong word because technically it shouldn’t mean what people use it for” arguments

Yep, totally agree. It seems like irrelevant trolling at best.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
305 points (92.5% liked)

World News

39045 readers
2913 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS