13
Could someone explain these OpenWRT LuCI firewall settings to me? I am having trouble interpereting what they are saying exactly.
(sh.itjust.works)
cross-posted to: https://sh.itjust.works/post/14114583
If the rule is about forwarding traffic from the lan interface to the wan interface, then why is there also a forward rule? How would inputs, and outputs make any sense if the rule is talking about forwarding? What does it mean for wan to forward to REJECT? I interperet that as saying that wan doesn't go anywhere, but that wouldn't make sense given that the router can send, and receive over the internet.
For example I would interperet the first rule as follows:
lan => wan: the conditions for which connections from thelaninterface are forwarded to to thewaninterface.Input: accept: thelaninterface accepts all connections originating from the network (I wouldn't understand the point of setting this to bereject).Output: accept: all connections exiting thewaninterface are accepted (again, I'm not sure what the point of this would be).Forward: accept: forwarding of packets fromlantowanis allowed.- Masquerade: I honestly don't know what the effect of enabling this would be. What would it mean to masquerade the
laninterface?
I tried finding documentation, and I did come across this, and this, but, from what I could understand, they didn't really answer any of my questions.
I don't understand this one. Wouldn't this then reject any connection to the router from the internet? Say you have a server behind the router that is port forwarded. If you have
Input: rejectonwan, wouldn't this then mean that the router just drops any request to the server as that would be an input originating on thewaninterface destined for the router?This is a great way to explain the masquerade setting! Thanks!
Thats how my setup looks, I do have about 7 NAT rules also and they work fine
Do you not know the answer to my question, or did you perhaps misunderstand it? You seem to have skipped over the whole comment ๐
in short, no I dont know how the firewalling works.
So a read of the wiki has what I thought
all as default settings, NAT is applied after the zone rules. So even though the zone will reject INPUT, a NAT rule will allow it.
Does that help?
I don't think this is correct. NAT doesn't "allow" connections -- It just masquerades the source IP as that of the router. For WAN connections to be accepted, conntrack must see them as related to connections that were initiated by the router, or by a device on the LAN (assuming, of course, that conntrack is enabled, which, in my case, it is).