155
Sponges tell us that the warming started in the 1860s (www.sbs.com.au)
submitted 9 months ago by Greyghoster@aussie.zone to c/climate@slrpnk.net
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It’s not surprising that we may have passed 1.5c however the confirmation that climate science is on the money is a worry.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 21 points 9 months ago

Here is an article from an issue of Popular Mechanics decrying the consequences of carbon pollution. So we've known about this for about as long as it's been happening as well.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
155 points (98.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5194 readers
954 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net