this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
570 points (94.1% liked)

News

35692 readers
3819 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Teachers describe a deterioration in behaviour and attitudes that has proved to be fertile terrain for misogynistic influencers

“As soon as I mention feminism, you can feel the shift in the room; they’re shuffling in their seats.” Mike Nicholson holds workshops with teenage boys about the challenges of impending manhood. Standing up for the sisterhood, it seems, is the last thing on their minds.

When Nicholson says he is a feminist himself, “I can see them look at me, like, ‘I used to like you.’”

Once Nicholson, whose programme is called Progressive Masculinity, unpacks the fact that feminism means equal rights and opportunities for women, many of the boys with whom he works are won over.

“A lot of it is bred from misunderstanding and how the word is smeared,” he says.

But he is battling against what he calls a “dominance-based model” of masculinity. “These old-fashioned, regressive ideas are having a renaissance, through your masculinity influencers – your grifters, like Andrew Tate.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Toxic masculinity is the reason for that as well. Being the victim is seen as being less masculine, which is seen as worthy of ridicule.

Toxic masculinity hurts everyone.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

When men do bad things: "this is toxic masculinity"

When women do bad things: "this is also toxic masculinity"

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When men don't get the support they need. Or are ridiculed for feeling emotions other than anger. And don't feel they can cry without being judged.

Women can absolutely be abusers. That's called shitty people and has nothing to do with masculinity, toxic or otherwise.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most men cry in front of a woman exactly once.

That's not toxic masculinity. It's toxic femininity and NO ONE is addressing it in a systemic way.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

In feminist theory "masculinity" and "femininity" don't mean "what men do" and "what women do" but value systems floating through society affecting people.

So in that sense yes woman can exhibit toxic masculinity, if they reinforce those shitty norms. Likewise men can exhibit toxic femininity... say, comparatively harmless example, by discouraging a tomboy from skating.

It's just one of those gazillions of instances where feminist terminology sucks absolutely donkeyballs because you need to read theory to understand it, which practically noone who calls themselves a feminist actually does, it's all vibes and signals very little analysis they abuse those terms just like the rest of the population. The rest of the population at least has an excuse, they're using the dictionary definition.

In this particular instance, "toxic (male) gender norm" would be much better.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It’s just one of those gazillions of instances where feminist terminology sucks absolutely donkeyballs

I mean, to get a little meta here, but if feminist theory essentially says "bad things are (toxic) masculinity, good things are femininity (feminism)" that betrays a deeper problem about the attitudes of feminist theorists, doesn't it? Sure, it's a terminology problem, but it's also a problem that those are the terms.

Calling something women do a "toxic male gender norm" is just as problematic.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Sure, it’s a terminology problem, but it’s also a problem that those are the terms.

I've talked to academic feminists about this and their reaction was pretty much "there were good reasons to chose those terms, doing it this way makes sense in the overall theoretical framework, it's an academic term and not for general use, academic terms always get misunderstood that's not a thing limited to feminism". When asked whether, as an academic subject having its own political movement, and being, in the wider sense, sociologists, they shouldn't at least study the societal implications of their terminology: Crickets.

And I can't really blame them. The ones I talked with about this definitely have their heart in the right place, acknowledged all the issues but truth be told if one of them goes against those established terms which are oh so useful equivocations for many a catty bitch they'll get skinned alive by exactly those catty bitches.

[–] meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

It’s called feminist studies - they’ll never say the thing they’re studying is or can be toxic. It’s always the masculine that’s bad, because the very subject name demands it.