137
submitted 9 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Senal@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago

OK, so let's assume that's a good faith literal interpretation.

Let's try it this way.

Yes, it possibly would be considered more logical, but people who threaten kids over videogames aren't generally considered to be working with an abundance of logical thought.

I could however be wrong in this generalisation given I only have my experience to go on, if your experience leads you to believe people who threaten kids over videogames are not running with a logic deficit then your statement makes sense I suppose.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
137 points (95.4% liked)

Gaming

20021 readers
194 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS