67
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] astanix@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

The best part is it was just copied from another site, at least it was cited. I sent to the site and it said the article is based on an article from another source.

Here's the true source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06633-0.pdf

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
67 points (86.8% liked)

science

14597 readers
638 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS