0
()
submitted a long while ago by @ to c/@
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago

It would be better to have something like a class action where they have to pay out $40 million each to hundreds of people rather than 10 people get ridiculous sums that are way more than they need and everyone else get nothing because the company went bankrupt after the first 10 settlements.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

It was probably easier to prove this single one rather than finding enough people for a class action.

[-] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, but it still shouldn't go to a single person. Better pay it as a fine to the state or distribute it to charities. Or, better yet pit the money into creating a foundation to help cancer victims.

Somewhere above the 10-100m$ range it loses any sort of compensatory purpose, both you and your eternal decendants could live off of just interest at that point and buy essentially anything.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No one ever actually gets paid out the full sum like this. I don't disagree that there are things that could and maybe should be done with this kind of cash but in cases like this its not always easy to prove a causal link between whatever chemicals and whatever illness. Regardless of what is done with the money this still sets a precedent and others will have an easier time suing for damages.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 0001
0 points (NaN% liked)

0 readers
0 users here now

founded a long while ago