775
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Mozilla is unhappy because the use of browser engines other than WebKit will be restricted to the EU, forcing them to develop two different apps.

For an independent browser like Firefox, managing two browsers is not easy, so it can be forgiven that this could be seen as almost harassment.

Also, the fact that the use of browser engines other than WebKit is limited to iOS means that the use of WebKit is still forced on iPadOS, which also increases the effort for Mozilla.

Source: https://iphonewired.com/news/746093/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0xtero@beehaw.org 41 points 11 months ago

So hear me out. What if we took $6.9M out of the CEO bonus and dropped the Mozilla AI project?
Maybe that would be enough to hire a maintainer or two for Firefox iOS port?
Maybe that could work?
I don't know, just an idea. Crazy.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 22 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that will fix Apple being total utter assholes. Giving them what they want always fixes everyone being assholes.

[-] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago

I don't know what you coul have against mozilla ai?

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

Mozilla: ignores years of customer complaints and requests

Mozilla: creates new product nobody asked for

Fans: "What's wrong with Product?"

[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

Mozilla: ignores years of customer complaints and requests

Are these customers donating, or purchasing mozilla products or services so that mozilla doesn't have to rely on google's donations?

Mozilla: creates new product nobody asked for

https://github.com/Mozilla-Ocho

Nearly 10k and 400 stars on those respective repos.

A way to run a large language model on any operating system, in any OS, in a simple, local, and privacy respecting manner?

For linux we have docker, but Windows users were starving for a good way to do this, and even on linux, removing the step of configuring docker (or other container runtimes) to work with nvidia, is nice.

And it's still FOSS stuff they aren't being paid for, currently. But there are plenty of ways to monetize this.

Here's an easy one: tie in the the vpn service they have to allow you to access the web ui of the computer running the llamafile remotely. Configure something like end to end encryption or or nat traversal (so not even mozilla can sniff the traffic), and you end up with a private LLM you can access remotely.

With this, maybe they can afford some actual development on firefox, without having to rely on google money.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Are these customers donating, or purchasing mozilla products or services so that mozilla doesn't have to rely on google's donations?

I'm confused what you're trying to say here.

Are you saying that Google has more of a right to dictate what Mozilla does because Google gives Mozilla the most money?

Are you saying Google told Mozilla to work on things other than Firefox with the money they were given?

Why bring up Google at all?

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Telemitry is way more useful than you think, because the loudest are not always right. Same for donations.

[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago

Because much of mozilla's funding is from a deal with google, that's why.

US$300 million annually. Approximately 90% of Mozilla's royalties revenue for 2014 was derived from this contract

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Foundation

A lot of money, but not enough to actually to actually do a lot. They keep cutting features their "customers" like. Why?

Because development is expensive.

Google props mozilla up to pretend they don't have a monopoly on the internet. Just enough money to barely keep up, not enough to truly stay competitive.

Mozilla wants to not rely on google money, so they are trying to expand their products. AI is overhyped, but still useful, and something worth investing in.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I know that, but why did you bring it up in order to contrast it with Mozilla's consumer base? Do you mean to say that Google is the actual paying customer?

It seems like such a bizarre thing to bring up at all.

[-] vinhill@feddit.de 12 points 11 months ago

Mozilla has a budget of around 200 mil for software development, so the 7 mil are probably not enough. Not defending the high pay though.

Also, AI Integration into browsers could very well be a deciding factor for mainstream users when choosing a browser. So having some expertise around e.g. running LLMs privacy preserving on client hardware for page summarisation could pay off. Llamafile for example, is something cool coming from the Mozilla AI stuff.

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

page summarisation

I see a future where the journalist gives the LLM two sentences and asks it to spit out a 2000 word article out of that.

The user then asks the LLM to Tl;Dr the article down to the two core sentences.

Same probably for business email. Jane goes "send an email to Joe saying no." The LLM goes "dear joe.. we appreciate.... your valuable conteibution.. unfortunately at this time... cannot consider... looking forward... thanks for .... whatever". Joe then clicks the "summarise" button and gets "Jane says no".

Amazing how far we've come.

[-] vinhill@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

The same with resumes. Using a LLM to write a resume and cover letter out of key facts, sending it, turning it back into key facts around the applicant.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

Firefox is the only browser with local website translation. Literally the extension is the only app on Android that does that.

[-] Shurimal@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Wrong. Vivaldi has had local translation for half a year now.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Cool! So it works on Chromium, they just need to implement it. Is it Foss? Do they use the same thing as Firefox?

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

Yes, but also require Apple to expand its EU software to people not in the EU

"Both is good" El Dorado meme

[-] jackpot@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

oh yeah put the onus on mozilla, nice one

[-] Auzy@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

i used to think that, but I cringe at myself. I'm not sure what other managers there are being paid, and in the CEO's defence, she was at Mozilla since the beginning, even through their bad times, pre-firefox days, and through their chrome days.

That being said, if its 6.9m dollars though, that is getting a bit high..

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
775 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

32179 readers
403 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS