779
Words fail me (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 22 points 8 months ago

Historically yes, an uprising of civilians has a great chance at asymmetrical warfare on their own turf.

You can’t destroy your own infrastructure like you can someone else’s.

Will they win? Almost certainly not.

Can they force some concessions? Probably

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 14 points 8 months ago

If they secdee it is not "your own infrastructure" for the main country anymore.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

It is though, they will still want to just reconquer and reconcile

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

They'd pull punches but lets not kid ourselves, Texas is not going to last very long against checks notes the entire United States military

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Honestly though, gutting the infra and starting from scratch would likely be the better choice in the end.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago

They wouldn't stand a chance. They're power grid is so brittle. The US military would destroy it probably within minutes of an actual war being started. The people who can't stand the heat or the cold (depending on the time of year) would turn on them so quickly.

Just like the south in the civil war, they don't have the infrastructure for the logistics needed to fight a war.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

You know unless the struggle is within the us military or the military wont get involved

[-] BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

These aren't the Taliban. These are a bunch of obese losers with handguns. They have nothing once McDonalds pull out.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
779 points (97.7% liked)

Funny

6613 readers
553 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS