124
Why people gave up using linux?
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
124 points (86.9% liked)
Asklemmy
43908 readers
836 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I too am using Linux, but finding an "automatic" linux is difficult since most distros are about performance. It's like trying to find an Italian Sports Car with an automatic.
And for the general user, they don't install their OS. It's preinstalled on a Laptop, or an all-in-one, think-dell office PC that their company provides them. Sign in like you do with everything today and you are good to go. Even Macs do this.
Linux has improved, but the desktop os's need to be more stable (in 1 year I broke 2 manjaro installs and my BTFS file system died in my Fedora install), packages need to be more up to date, and there needs to be gui's for any setting that a user needs to access like restarting a systemd process. A general user will not touch a terminal. Let alone download a git repo, just to update the latest build of Mangohud since the Ubuntu version is so out of date that the GOverlay GUI Utility that's on Ubuntu doesn't work with it.
manjaro's so notorious for it's bad mainteinance it even gained a website for tracking the last time they screwed something up. I'm glad I haven't seen anyone recommend that shitty distro in a while. Tbh nix (the package manager) has proven to provide excellent stability no matter whether I used it on macOS or Artix. It's been more than a year since I had to reinstall my OS or generally deal with large scale system breakage. Also have grub set up to provide both a LTS and edge kernel, for example. The last installation that broke for me was well over a year ago, it was OpenSUSE Tumbleweed and it also used btrfs. Which is a pretty nice FS if set up correctly, but by default it's quite slow. Then I switched to Alpine since I've been using it on a VPS for a couple of months earlier and absolutely loved it. I don't count fucking up the configuration files as system breaking because I assume the consensus to be that we refer to unexpected issues here. Getting rid of GDM, glibc, bash, systemd, coreutils and similar bloat not only speeds up your system, it also improves it's security and stability.
I wonder when I'll become so deranged to start tinkering around with BSDs and Gentoo, it'll be pretty funny if instead of wasting my time gaming I'll waste it hacking my system to improve it's responsiveness by 1-2% lmao
TBH, when Manjaro broke it was my fault, I know it was my own fault, and I feel if I was running EndeavorOS the results would've been the same if I did the same actions.
That said, yes the miss-matches repos drove me insane, especially as someone who likes keep my update number at 0, and I can't update AUR packages. And there were a few niggles and grips here and there. But as a power user, who didn't want to touch a terminal, Manjaro has the best set of Setting and Configuration GUI's I've used thus far in Linux. If another distro took what Manjaro did, but kept it to the Arch Repos, then I'd use it in a heart beat.