this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
62 points (98.4% liked)

News

36160 readers
3213 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Protesters angered by the planned burning of a copy of the Quran stormed the Swedish Embassy in Baghdad early Thursday, breaking into the compound and lighting a small fire.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lols@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am happy to see that you agree that storming an embassy is bad. Seriously because it is NOT obvious by what I replied to.

its not obvious whether they agree that storming an embassy is bad because they didnt say anything about the matter

I think just in general we should NOT act in a manner that would be considered offensive to another group just to be (for lack of a better work) a dick. The sad thing is, we already don’t live in that world and this refugee that burned the Quran might have been burning it as a “dick move” or maybe he was burning it because he has a very real and hurtful story of how he became a refugee from Iraq.

this does not sound like you think we should NOT act in a manner that would be considered offensive to another group just to be a dick

it sounds like making excuses, especially for someone complaining about folks making excuses

I can tell you I am biased toward any religion trying to tell me how to act. If I want to burn every holy book that I buy/own then I should be able to. Pushing your beliefs on others is wrong. Me burning a book doesn’t effect you unless you decide that it does. You forcing your religious laws on me does actually effect me even if I don’t believe in your religion

someone commenting that burning books to provoke violent outrage is vile falls under none of the above

What happens if I’m eating an unclean food infront of some extremist religious person? Do you think I’m trying to be offensive because I’m eating pork in public?

we arent talking about eating unclean food in front of some extremist person, equating the two is disingenuous

I’m not trying to schoolyard argue with you,

uhuh

I think giving up some acts of freedom of speech to religious extremists is a bad path to follow

someone commenting that burning books to provoke violent outrage is vile falls under none of the above

We shouldn’t push people to violent acts, but one could argue that the refugee himself was pushed to this “violent act” by the extremists in his home country

the man in sweden was not pushed to burn a book because of the political climate in another country a continent away

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

I think there is a lot of misunderstanding in this. I will not try to explain everything, because I feel I'm not using the correct words to explain my thoughts.

I will reply to

we arent talking about eating unclean food in front of some extremist person, equating the two is disingenuous>

I was mentioning this example in order to try to explain how appeasement doesn't work with extremists. If burning a book is so offensive that they have a call to arms then I am against them. I don't care what book. It's all paper.

the man in sweden was not pushed to burn a book because of the political climate in another country a continent away>

Oh cool. I just assumed that the political climate of his country of origin had something to do with why he was a refugee, but I guess not?

I'm not familiar with all the details of why he was granted refugee status. I just agreed with him on principle. I'm not an edgelord, and I respect everyone's religion in practice. Which is why I am attempting to advocate for his personal creed. Religion is personal and I respect it until someone tries to push their religious laws on someone else.