World News

24504 readers

13 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

China’s Population Shrink Doesn't Assure a ‘Bigger Pie for Fewer People’ (www.voanews.com)

submitted 2 years ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/news@beehaw.org

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/8051008

As a result of the one-child policy, China’s fertility rate was well below 2 children per woman for more than three decades.

At the same time, according to the Beijing-based YuWa Population Research Institute, the average cost of raising a child to the age of 18 in China stood at 485,000 yuan ($76,629) for a first child in 2019, almost seven times China’s per capita GDP that year ($10,144). The financial burden has many families thinking twice before adding members to their family.

The combination of more retirees and a shrinking working-age population means fewer people have to support a larger share of the population, putting pressure on Beijing’s health care and pension programs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

And this doesn't even touch on the effects an economic downturn could have when couples are already choosing not to have kids for economic reasons.

This could turn into a negative-growth spiral if Beijing doesn't figure out how to incentivize families to have more (but not too many!) kids soon.

[–] Domiku@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even better: let’s create an economic system that doesn’t require endless population growth

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm not sure who the "us" in "let's" is, but I don't think Beijing is considering any systemic changes right now. I'm all for changing away from Capitalist systems, but in the meantime most Chinese citizens are in pretty economically-precarious positions, and I'm certainly not going to vote, from my safe position in another country, for their country to collapse in hopes it would rebuild into something better. I'll hold my 'let it all burn down so we can rebuild into [preferably a loosely-associated series of Mutualist cooperatives]' advocacy for my own country.