81
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
81 points (97.6% liked)
GenZedong
4251 readers
6 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Why is Lincoln shown? What does the author try to imply?
I think it's just a recognizably American symbol.
I'd guess the implication is that freedom shouldn't be given to reactionaries and excusing it on the basis of "The American Way" is ahistorical considering than Lincoln didn't give it to southern slavers either.
Lincoln was pretty racist ngl. The largest single execution of Natives was carried out under his government, though I dont think the inclusion was hinting at that.
It's that the Nazis in the US aren't in assfuck nowhere senora desert, they're infront of famous places