this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
278 points (96.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9630 readers
107 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The cause was easy enough to identify: Data parsed by Kuhls and her colleagues showed that drivers were speeding more, on highways and on surface streets, and plowing through intersections with an alarming frequency. Conversely, seatbelt use was down, resulting in thousands of injuries to unrestrained drivers and passengers. After a decade of steady decline, intoxicated-driving arrests had rebounded to near historic highs.

... The relationship between car size and injury rates is still being studied, but early research on the American appetite for horizon-blotting machinery points in precisely the direction you’d expect: The bigger the vehicle, the less visibility it affords, and the more destruction it can wreak.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pyramid8058@kbin.social 37 points 10 months ago (4 children)

In my city, police have pretty much given up on doing any traffic enforcement.

[–] DrCatface@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

same, why? i didnt see any cops during xmas new year, then this morning i see 3 highway patrols, probably on their way to an accident

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Quiet quitting after Floyd protests hurt their feelings.

[–] DrCatface@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

in nsw australia... yeah man sure

[–] psud@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Same in mine, in Canberra, Australia. Maybe I'm just not driving at the times they're doing drink driving enforcement. I recall when I was a youth the breathalyzers were set up randomly midnight to 4am

We do have camera enforcement of speed, red lights, and mobile phones

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd prefer breathalyzers between 6 and midnight

[–] psud@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

My city definitely did breath testers for people coming home from work in the past

And the place does them well when they do them out of peak hour — they stop all traffic on a major road, test people, arrest them or let them continue

In peak hour they pull over cars they're suspicious of. Driving badly, young drivers, etc

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Usual boot licking blah blah blah "They do so well, checking people with no sign of anything wrong happening". goes hand in hand with a BAC level so low you can't tell without a machine, because they are not intoxicated.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Hell yeah brother

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I saw a police pulling radar in a school zone right around when the kids get let out. Everyone still did 15 over the limit and the officer didn't pull anyone. I'm sure they pulled people speeding faster than that but it seems they can't just ticket the entire town when 10-15 over the limit is so normalized. People still tell me all the time a cop isn't even allowed to pull you for just 10 over (which is false).

[–] Bigmouse@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

... Don't you guys have speeding cameras? As in, you drive by too fast, it snaps a pic of your license plate and after a couple of weeks you get mail saying "surprise, bitch! Here's a picture of you speeding. That'll be $400 or you're going to jail :)"?

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Im just starting to see some of them but they all have warning signs before hand. We have a similar thing where your speed flashes on a lighted sign if it clocks you too fast, but since they aren't enforced by anything the act more like a high score meter.

[–] Bigmouse@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's wild imho. Where i'm at, there's speeding cameras at fixed locations AND mobile speeding cameras that are hidden and moved around. And the only warning you get is the sign with the speed limit.

Those street speedometers we have aswell within towns. But the fact that you don't know wether there is a speeding camera next to it makes it more effective i guess...

[–] psud@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have seen mobile speed cameras and cops with radar guns in school zones in wealthier parts of my town, and they pull over anyone more than 2kph over the limit

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Wish I could say I've seen the same. I find it rare for people to do any less than 5 over in a school zone. The particular instance above was also influenced by the fact there is a highway entrance/exit about 1 km up the road from the school zone.

[–] capital@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m not saying it’s the reason, but as soon as they do and the perp wrecks and kills themselves they have dipshits online whingeing about how the poor kid of only 24 didn’t deserve to die for simply speeding.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So its better to just let them keep speeding and wait until they kill or injure someone else rather than themselves? Does that really sound more fair? Many police departments will stop the chase if traffic is too heavy to safely pursue. The cops shouldn't shoot the speeder but it's defintely not on the cops if the speeder disobeys traffic laws, refuses to pull over, and attempts to evade police resulting in a collision/personal injury.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I agree with you.