76
submitted 9 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/cooking@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, definitely still possible, but my point is that wages no longer support having one person that can devote their whole day to cooking/cleaning/etc. No matter how good you are at cooking dinner in 30 minutes, you would be able to make better and cheaper meals given 8 hours.

[-] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

I honestly don't think that really true though. Frozen and fresh produce + protein, beans, rice is about as cheap as you get. Maaaaybe you save a few bucks buying in bulk at Costco but that's an extreme for limited gains. And adding time to food prep doesn't necessarily make it better. You can eat very very well in the US on 5 hours and $100 a week.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Buying in bulk can actually realize significant savings. It's definitely true that more active time does not directly translate to more savings, especially with just a little planning. Lots of food is happy to cook itself while you wait.

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
76 points (94.2% liked)

Science of Cooking

1057 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/cooking @ Mander.xyz!

We're focused on cooking and the science behind how it changes our food. Some chemistry, a little biology, whatever it takes to explore a critical aspect of everyday life.

Background Information:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS