this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
770 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39366 readers
2068 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Great read. I’m bookmarking this. Thanks.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I read it. I'm really not sure what I'm meant to be talking from it. I think a lot of Marxists don't understand what capitalism is.

"Its very structure, therefore, deprives us of the ability to decide collectively exactly what and how much we want to produce, on what energic basis and through what kinds of social relations. It deprives us, too, of the capacity to determine how we want to use the social surplus we collectively produce; how we want to relate to nature and to future generations; how we want to organize the work of social reproduction and its relation to that of production. Capitalism, in sum, is fundamentally anti-democratic. Even in the best-case scenario, democracy in a capitalist society must perforce be limited and weak."

Capitalism is entirely based on the the free hand of the market not on votes. People effectively vote with money. If people want more pears instead of apples, then more pears are planted than apples. The free hand of the market works without votes and infact is a lot lot more efficient than voting on everything or on trying to control these choices from a central government. Its fundamentally why (among other reasons) capitalism is so much more efficient than anything else.

Something that seems horribly missed by certain people that don't understand capitalism is externalities. Most economists want these corrections made to prices. They want ways to fix the tragedy of the commons, they don't want factories everywhere polluting they want the best use of capital, land and labour.

People get to vote on the limit of business. They can choose to have green spaces around cities and there is absoultely nothing a business can do about it. All the wealth made from capitalism that wouldn't exist without it is taxed by the government and the government can use that money to better effect. Lots of countries and cities have green spaces and high environmental protection. Capitalist want the government to pay for education and the government wants to pay for education because it gets more money back from taxes.

If I have missed something please let me know. But I'm getting tired of people on this site no understanding basic economics so I'm not sure how long this conversation will continue.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

There are so many engrained assumptions here that would take a long time to undo, a lot of reading, and they take a long time to digest. I went through the journey, and thought like this once, until I realised there was a lot more to this than this narrative that is classically taught. I'm sorry. We should leave it here, maybe you'll find it eventually. I appreciate your consideration of the text. It's a good starting place. Ps, I was not the one who down voted.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Communism has been tried and failed exceptionally.

Hopefully something else comes along but I think it will just be a form of capitalism with higher taxes and UBI.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I wouldn't call what has been tried communism as it was never a dictatorship of the proletariat, but I'm not convinced by orthodox communism either. That is also missing a whole lot of geopolitical nuance to what actually happened. Either way, what we have isn't working and it's time to find something new. Lemmy isn't a good place for theory anyway, not that any other social media is much better.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Lemmy is a great place for theory.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm waiting for the day someone suggests I viable alternative to what we have now

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They will be born of need, when things break down. Such is the way of these things.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago

400 years and going strong. Might have to wait a while.