388
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

President Biden’s reelection campaign raised more than $1 million through online fundraising alone in the 24 hours after the president’s Jan. 6 anniversary speech, according to numbers exclusively provided to The Hill.

Biden on Friday gave a full throated attack against former President Trump, his likely GOP opponent, and warned Americans that Trump’s reelection would pose a threat to American democracy. The president zeroed in on Jan. 6 to mark the third anniversary of the U.S. Capitol riots and argued in his remarks that democracy is on the ballot in 2024.

In response to the 24-hour fundraising haul, the Biden campaign noted that they see preserving democracy as a political winner for the president in 2024.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 73 points 5 months ago

Honestly only a million is a weak number. Three or four would have been good, six would make me think democracy might survive. The 2020 election was over $14 billion, and we've had strong inflation since then.

Getting people pumped to support Biden is like getting excited about plain toast. We best start acting like it's our first food in a month.

[-] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago

Democrats 101. Let perfection stand in the way of pragmatic voting.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Never underestimate the DNC's ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 8 points 5 months ago

DNC 101: let 1992 thinking stand in the way of 2024 solutions to 2024 problems.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

Is everyone losing their fucking minds? I'll shove that plain toast up my fucking ass if it means my kids can keep waking up, going to school, and altogether living normal lives. Comfort apparently does breed contempt because nobody is really fighting for this shit. None of us were there before plumbing, before democracy, lets not fucking find out.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Yeah. One party wants minorities crushed, women dead in childbirth, and Christianity to be law. The other kinda sucks. None of the above isn’t happening. The Dems won’t learn a lesson from losing but the gop sure will learn from winning

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I dunno, America seems to be in a real fuck around kinda mood this year.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 19 points 5 months ago

I gave Bernie a ton of money because I knew he was getting mostly grassroots donations.

Biden has a bunch of millionaires to ask for money who have a lot more disposable income than I do. He can go ask them.

Meanwhile my $27 a month is going to bail funds.

[-] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Bernie outspent Biden in many states during the primary and still lost badly.

The reality is that the broader electorate isn't as left-wing as Bernie.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I think you missed the point he was trying to make. It wasn't about the merits of a candidate, it was about the type of person they use as funding sources.

[-] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I donated a bunch last cycle, but the DNC spent a fair portion on promoting 'spoiler' candidates in Republican primaries. I don't want my money spent on further radicalizing the GOP. If Dems are worried about money I have a great suggestion of a line item to cut that will cover far more than any contribution I could make...

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I can't blame anyone for not being pumped about Biden. At this point he's making Reagan look spry and lively.

That's a big part of the problem though. The left needs a populist like Bernie or Obama in order to draw in the money and support. An institutional centrist like Biden just has nil for enthusiasm. Which has nothing to do with being able to be president, but at the end of the day, elections are popularity contests. And at this point, Bidens biggest personality draw, is that he's not Trump. Which is probably almost enough to win the next election by itself. If only by the barest of margins. Not really the kind of margin you want to risk the future of the free world on.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

Greatest Democracy in the World™

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

It’s pretty telling that a dollar amount is an indicator of chances to win an election. The fact that you’re talking about this like it’s normal says so much about how fucked our political system is.

(Not at all saying that what you’re saying is wrong at all. Just commenting on how accustomed we’ve become to it that it’s normalized)

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Oh it's completely fucked up, and I fully realize that. Worse yet, the million dollars that were reported is merely a polling sample of the actual cash flows to superPACs and other organizations both domestic and foreign.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

I'll support Biden. Not super excited, but I'll still support him given the alternative.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

After '16-'20, plain toast would seem like a welcome blessing amongst the shit the country had become.

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
388 points (95.5% liked)

politics

18065 readers
4342 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS