517
Retiring House Republican says $174,000 isn't enough money for members of Congress: 'Most of us don't have wealth'
(www.businessinsider.com)
this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
517 points (96.6% liked)
politics
31333 readers
2573 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
are you fucking kidding me. if my salary had kept up with inflation, id be making 250k. if average people dont get that benefit, why the fuck should they.
on top of that, they have rules specifically allowing them to game the stock market with their insider knowledge.
if you cant make money being a congresscritter, youre just not trying.
There's an argument to be made for paying Congress enough where they can't easily be bought out by special interests. Right now Congress is generally attainable only for those with existing wealth.
Consider that you have to maintain your house in your home district, maintain a residence in DC (not cheap!), travel between DC/home district, pay off student/car/etc loans, etc. That's not including family obligations.
I'd like to see a comprehensive plan to pay those in Congress more, but in exchange, severely clamp down insider trading and limit how politicians can accept money to themselves and their campaigns from special interests.
i think theres also an argument about revisiting these requirements for homes in multiple jurisdictions. its 2024, we need to stop pretending everyone needs to be in the same room to accomplish nothing.
how about, when youre in washington here is the hotel you use. welcome to public service.
We know from the Clarence Thomas issues that some of them will never be satisfied with how much they legitimately make, and turn to more questionable income sources. Tying a raise to explicit ethics standards is key: clearly assuming they will do what’s right was too naive
No.
Thank you for a well-reasoned response.
Lmao I was drinking a bit last night, had typed out a long response that was getting out of hand so I had to reel it back in.
I agree with most of what you said though
Hah, fair enough! I've done that plenty of times
Godamn I love this place, cheers