670
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

An attorney for Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, had urged the eight-person jury to “send a message” with its verdict.

Rudy Giuliani should pay a pair of Georgia election workers he repeatedly and falsely accused of fraud $148 million in damages, a federal jury said Friday.

The eight-person jury awarded Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, the sum after a four-day trial, during which they testified that Giuliani’s lies in support of former President Donald Trump’s bogus stolen-election claims subjected them to a torrent of racist and violent threats and turned their lives upside down.

Freeman testified Wednesday that she was terrorized by Trump supporters and forced to move from her home because of Giuliani’s smears. “I was scared to come home at dark, you know,” a visibly emotional Freeman said on the witness stand. “I was just scared, I knew I had to move.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 140 points 11 months ago

Has Alex Jones paid out a penny yet?

Will Rudy?

These guys seem to be able to ignore these judgements with impunity.

I am shocked that his attorney acknowledged wrongdoing. That'll fuck any appeal attempts.

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Rudy probably can't pay that anyway, he's been in a bad way financially for a while now.

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 72 points 11 months ago

Rudy took a private plane to turn himself in in Georgia this summer. An article I read mentioned he has an apartment in Manhattan listed on the market for $6.1M. Now, I doubt he's got $148M, but he's not dead fucking broke like he's trying to claim. At least not yet.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No you misunderstand, his nonprofit foundation was selling his manhattan apartment for 6.1m. He controls the foundation but that money can't be taken away.

I haven't actually looked it up to see if he even owned the apartment he lived in, but there are many ways to shelter controlled assets in ways that minimize liability and tax burdens on the person who controls them. These mechanisms are a big part of the reason why rich people don't pay taxes. Instead they donate their earnings or claim losses on stock transactions.

If you donate a million dollars of your assets to your foundation while simultaneously earning a million dollars in cash from business dealings- how much tax do you pay? $0. Million in pocket, million dollar asset sheltered and still in your control. Your foundation control can be passed from generation to generation...

Keep in mind his foundation can "employ" him and provide lodgings to him and other reasonable expenses (e.g. food, travel, lodging... you know... the things we all toil away to earn money and pay 30%+ taxes for.)

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

I hear about bad faith charities and foundations all of the time. It’s insane that this is just accepted and unchallenged.

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Lawmakers aren't going to close that loophole because they all do it themselves.

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I like to believe it isn’t all of them but yeah that’s the heart of these problems.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Drain the swamp, man! Drain the Swamp Man!

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 months ago

You would have to wonder if he was a just a regular Joe blow fellow if he would be in jail in till he could pay?

[-] plz1@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Debtors prisons are not something society should go back to. IIRC, this is a civil case, so, no jail. He should be in jail, but that isn't in the cards until he's convicted criminally.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If the money you owe is child support, debtors prisons are a thing right now. Also, during the hearing where the judge decides to put you in jail, you've no right to an attorney.

Of course this is more expensive than just giving benefits to single mothers, and children gain no advantage by having fathers in jail, but cruelty is the point.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

No. Genuinely poor people are what the legal world refers to as judgment proof. Best you can do is garnish wages, which I doubt Rudy has any. You can also put a lien on property, but if they don't have any, you get nothing.

[-] Maruki_Hurakami@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

Alex filed for bankruptcy, so he hasn't paid anything yet. The families recently said they'd settle for 6% but I haven't seen anything since.

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

He filed for bankruptcy but last I heard the bankruptcy court found his judgement in the Sandy Hook case couldn't be discharged through bankruptcy. So he still owes. It'll just be a long drawn out affair to chase down his hidden assets.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

No Jones declared bankruptcy and Infowars is on the chopping block to get liquidated, after that they'll go back to court to seek liquidation of his personal assets, homes, cars, watches Etc.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Court isn't fast, most waive speedy trial anyway.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Jones was in default before the trial even started. He's been found liable for a billion dollars. He hasn't paid a penny.

How long is it going to take? He's still on the air. He's still making money. He's still pedaling bullshit vitamins.

Nothing. Has.Changed.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Like I said it's not going to be fast and he's being investigated for hiding assets last I heard.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
670 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1055 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS