160

Naughty Dog Ends Development Of The Last Of Us Online (www.gameinformer.com)

submitted 11 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] jose1324@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah I don't get it either. Everyone rn is saying that Halo infinite multiplayer sucks because you "have to" pay for cosmetics or do lots of shit to progress the battlepass.

Literally all COSMETIC. Like it's not even pay to win, just play the genuinely fun multiplayer game wtf

[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Halo Infinite's problem isn't that there's a store where you can buy cosmetic items. It's that the game was built AROUND the store. Cosmetics took a priority over gameplay, features, etc.

[-] jose1324@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

What priority? Gameplay is fine to me and what missing features?

[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The previous Halo games prioritized features over microtransactions. There are tons of articles lamenting all the things left out of Halo Infinite e.g. https://screenrant.com/halo-infinite-launch-missing-features-forge-coop-multiplayer/

I see you were too young to have played previous Halo titles and so you immediately downvoted without giving a response. I'm sorry you're too ignorant to realize what they stole from you.

[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, if the game is fun then ignore the cosmetics. If you like the cosmetics enough, then buy the cosmetics. As long as gameplay elements aren’t locked behind a paywall, I see no problem.