Games

16759 readers

1011 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

570

Twitch will now allow "Artistic Nudity" following the viral topless meta (www.dexerto.com)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/games@sh.itjust.works

359 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Twitch Updated their Sexual Content Policy:

Changes: Certain content now allowed with labels
Artistic Nudity: Permitted under Sexual Themes Label
Game Nudity: Contextual; labels necessary
Body Painting: Acceptable with appropriate label
Mature Games: Label generally covers content
Stream Visibility: Impacted by content labels
Twerking, grinding and pole dancing are now allowed without a label.

Via https://twitter.com/Dexerto/status/1735024184114245689

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

https://acpeds.org/position-statements/the-impact-of-pornography-on-children

https://aifs.gov.au/research/research-snapshots/effects-pornography-children-and-young-people

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534324/

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Here's a study showing the opposite, and linking to many others as well.

In other words, it's far from 'universally accepted'

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088458/

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

From your own link:

However, pornography use was associated with increases in both self-esteem and symptoms of depression and anxiety, albeit only among adolescent women in one of the two panels. In addition, low subjective well-being was associated with a subsequent increase in pornography use, but only in female adolescents in one panel. This study’s results are not consistent with concerns about pornography use negatively contributing to male adolescents’ psychological well-being, but suggest potential antagonistic links between pornography use and specific facets of mental well-being in adolescent women. Such links should be considered tentative until verified with further research.

Seems that your own study you posted acknowledges that porn with adolescents, mainly with adolescent males, is generally accepted and understood with their negative links.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I tried to link a reasonably balanced view of the issue. It'd be nice if you didn't cherry pick statements. The point being, different studies have shown different results, and there's no concrete conclusion to date. Hence your statement about 'universal acceptance' is extremely debatable.

[–] AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you accuse someone of cherrypicking while admitting you cherrypicked yourself (which I should discard because your opinion of balanced is right and his of general consensus is wrong, obviously...)? Personally, I see a big difference between proper sexual education and children beginning to explore puberty with parental guidance and streamers drawing porn for money and exposure to sexuality becoming a circlejerk to personality cults.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Balanced in the sense that I acknowledged there's an ongoing debate and linked a source that covered both sides, unlike a certain someone who claimed 'universal acceptance' of their worldview. Hopefully you can see a difference there.

[–] AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago

You are asking me whether I assume universal and general are used interchangeably most of the time or whether I assume that when people say universal consensus they do so literally and without any degree of dissension, something which rarely occurs. At this point we might as well be talking about which dictionary definition of a word is the "real" definition. His wording could have been better to avoid criticism, sure.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The last sentence of your quote literally says that there is no actual conclusive data from this, and any links need further study to be considered real and actionable.

You didnt even cherry pick this correctly

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Conclusions

Despite common public concerns that surround adolescent use of sexual media [66], the results of this first longitudinal assessment of the relationship between pornography use and adolescents’ subjective well-being provide no evidence that pornography use contributes to decreased subjective well-being in adolescent men. We found, however, limited evidence of the contradictory contribution of pornography use to female adolescents’ dysregulated mood and self-evaluation. Future research in this area should use large-scale prospective designs, which would include different developmental stages, to clarify possible effects in adolescent women. Given the public concern surrounding pornography use among adolescents, the veracity of these findings will likely be challenged. Thus, replication of our findings with diverse adolescent samples from other cultural settings is highly warranted.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This repeats the exact same point I pointed out. That they found nothing conclusive, only mildly suggestive data, and will need repeated deeper study to confirm if the data pointed towards an actual conclusion or if it was a flaw in the study.

I really wish they taught scientific reading in non-college school, you posted my own evidence for me as if it was a rebuttal

E: also? This study used regular porn, while twitch would have typically woman-led self-led content, which completely shifts the research. So even if this said what you think it says, thats still not conclusive for all porn. Just stereotypical male focused and male directed video porn.

[–] AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works -2 points 11 months ago

Peas to apples, that study only involves adolescents, and it doesn't clearly illustrate or partition according to the age groups. It also seems to merely itself to the self-assessment of those polled and particular concerns about body image and inadequacy.