this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
106 points (97.3% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
129 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They couldn't implement a tax to help make it less lucrative? I honestly don't know, but it does seem like something they could do.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Taxes are an issue for people that aren't already rich enough to not care and the people actually hoarding residences and leaving them empty are in that category.

It seems like a lot of people have a very hard time understanding the governments division of powers and I think it's a very big problem because it gives the provinces a free pass for many things as people blame the federal government without realising that they don't have the means to solve these issues...

Cities aren't even political entities from a constitutional perspective, they're fully dependent of the provincial governments and are called their pets, so guess who could force them to increase density? Not Trudeau!

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's it wasn't lucrative, they wouldn't build them. Unfortunately.

Edit: that's why we need social housing programs where social housing is built by the government.