209
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
209 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15908 readers
468 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I have known 2 women who were a conventional "10". They picked and chose who they wanted based upon success, money, reputation etc. It all fell apart. They're both in their 50s now. Unmarried, unhappy, realising that the looks never got them what they thought would make them happy. The guys they rejected moved on, settled and compromised in that wholesome way rather than any "simp" way, and are all happily married, successful.
If a woman has picked a partner that's not conventionally "her type" then I say fair do's! A Hampshire expression. May they be happy. Jealousy has no place in any of this.
Wow, this comment has done a number for my mental health, thank you.