view the rest of the comments
UK Politics
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
I am quite happy for him to go to Greece if he wants to stay with the Marbles so much.
They're not in Greece though are they?
ofc they are not. It is ridiculous to want to hold onto them. The amount of people who want to keep them in the UK is very small.
EDIT: to correct a typo.
No they're not in Greece that's the point.
Greece want them in Greece not in the UK.
Typo - OFC they are not. But they will get them under Starmer, he has said as much.
I'm totally confused by everything you say because none of it seems to have any connection with the previous comment.
The statues are not in Greece They're in the UK, that's the problem.
What are you saying? Because I literally can't work it out.
They are heading to Greece. They will be there within the next 10 years. If Starmer doesn't just hand them over, then the Greeks will use their veto to stop the UK joining the EU. Since Starmer wants good relations with the EU without actually committing to join, then the Elgin Marbles will be a good start point, as well as doing the right thing.
It's nothing to do with the British government where they're displayed. It's entirely in the remit of the British museum.
Yes but, but also no
https://www.britishmuseum.org/about-us/governance
Give over you clown. Who pays the wages and assigns staffing at the museum.
Anti-royal pro-colonial is a angle we don't often see.
Giving things back is not pro-colonial. Did we even have any claim on Greece as a colony?
There was more than one empire when the British empire was at its height. Greece was under the control of the Ottoman empire. The purchase of the marbles was an agreement with them rather than the Greeks themselves.
What has that got to do with the price of fish?
I was answering your question about whether Britain had claimed Greece as a colony. Colonialism isn't just about the British empire.
And again - price of fish. The topic at hand has nothing to do with colonialism.
Syldon@feddit.uk
Look at the comment above and stick to the context
andthenthreemore see anyone can do that
Except I took your whole question to give you context to my answer, rather than taking an extra from a sentence which flipped the meaning.
You can't complain about my comment having nothing to do with the price of fish when I was just giving you an answer to your question.