97
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 9 months ago

Should we stop critically supporting Gaza because they have anti-LGBT views also?

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Russia isn’t being bombed back into the Stone Age by a ravaging imperialist power. They don’t deserve sympathy or excuses for takes like this.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 9 months ago

Have you forgotten that the Donbas has been getting bombed by actual western funded nazis since 2014?

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Is that Russia? How does the suffering of the people of Donbas influence the people of Kazan or Volgograd, or the Russian leadership into taking bizarre, disgusting, and reactionary decisions like this?

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 9 months ago

Is that Russia?

As recently as 1991 yes; Its up for them to decide and the consenus in the area has been Russian unification for a while now.

How does the suffering of the people of Donbas influence the people of Kazan or Volgograd, or the Russian leadership into taking bizarre, disgusting, and reactionary decisions like this?

How is occupying a position in the western hegemony, the one who is funding the needless slaughter of east ukraine justification for the uncoupling of support from the people that our governments are killing?

I think that if you sincerely want things to get better for LGBT+ comrades in Russia, which I do; it comes with the war stopping.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

“Things to get better”

This law was passed this past week.

How does the death and destruction in the Donbas justify this reactionary policy? How will the war ending rectify this? Why would they not just continue down this reactionary path?

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 9 months ago

The law passed this week, 10 years into a war with the west.

No ones justifying anything, its a material analysis of the dialectics at play.

War enables right wing reactionary policies to flourish due to unity becoming the priority in the face of a percieved existenstial threat, as such its a given that the fastest route to the war ending is favourable for conditions improving.

And lastly, do you seriously think a forever war will be the better path?

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

A law that is built upon decades of rising hate and discrimination, this is just giving that a rubber stamp. It has been terrible for a while. Watch the Russian news, they speak about the community like vermin and pests.

Why am I to believe that the war ending would rectify this? Would that not invigorate those same right wing policies? They would be proven correct, and be seen as strong, giving them even more ground to build upon.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 months ago

A law that is built upon decades of rising hate and discrimination, this is just giving that a rubber stamp. It has been terrible for a while. Watch the Russian news, they speak about the community like vermin and pests.

Thats why you need to trace this back to 1991, where the justification for this started. The USSR was actually starting to liberalize laws regarding LGBT+ people and I think they would have followed the same timeline as China/Cuba in modern times if that never happened. Thats why the ongoing war is connected to this, because the tensions created with the collapse of the USSR have never been resolved.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I fully agree with you, but that doesn’t answer the question. This is still an unjustifiable and disgusting reactionary path.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 months ago

I agree with you comrade, my position is ceasefire and LGBT+ and communist liberation in Russia; I do see the war as degrading conditions and enabling this path, and I think the route out of it requires a ceasefire and concessions from Ukraine.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago

I truly hope you are right. I agree with your stance, but if we are truthful then all we can say is that only time will tell.

I also I didn’t mean to be hostile with you, this is just a very sore subject, and it’s painful when some people blindly push their “critical” support at any cost, which in this case might happen to be my life. You have not done that however, and I hope you have a good day comrade. Thanks for your responses.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 9 months ago

Some of them literally are, and if NATO wins they will most likely got thrown in even worse nightmare than in 90's because right now natoids openly speaks about balkanisation, setting up warlords and genocide.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Donbas is not Russian land, and that is entirely irrelevant to this situation.

I’m sure leaders in ivory towers discriminating against gay people in Moscow will help the people of Donbas best NATO! Wooo!

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Donbas was Russian for centuries, and certainly wasn't Ukrainian, until Lenin intervened and told them to shut up when they didn't wanted to belong to Ukraine (rare but severe Lenin L), and even then only on paper since they tried to secede two or three times since.

And i don't even understand your point. If you want to be so blunt and reductive, you could say the same about Gaza where LGBT situation is not all roses too. Are we only supposed to support people below certain threshold of military power or numerical disadvantage? Why Russia is so much worse than Iran, DPRK or all other socially conservative countries which we do support more or less critically?

I’m sure leaders in ivory towers discriminating against gay people in Moscow will help the people of Donbas best NATO! Wooo!

It is precisely what is currently happening.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Liberals looove that take. I seen one go as far as to deny evidence of the genocide because "Al Jazeera is funded by Qatar"

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago

I agree that this is a negative devolopment, but my answer is 'stop bombing them'

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
97 points (99.0% liked)

World News

2175 readers
15 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS