97
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ComradeJenny@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 9 months ago

Alright Z Posters, how do Ya`ll justify this?

Come on, you over there in Dongistan, tell me how Putin is "Based" And will help communism return to Russia?

Russian Nationalists infiltrating Marxist circles honestly is just annoying and I have zero tolerance on that.

[-] ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 9 months ago

I think I speak for most everyone when I say that this isn’t based, but marginally better than the Nazis that Ukraine brings into their ranks and radicalize other troops to accept Fascist-friendly brigades. Everyone here should criticize Russia in their many faults at the same time. That’s the beauty of the Dialectical Method, we can point out shortcomings and successes and address them as they are, not how we would like them to be.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Communism is the only ideology at the present which actually gets better over time, rather than just decaying into fascism. I see a lot of anticommunists point to their past failings or current flaws and there's a reason they ignore things like plans for the future; because it would make them look like a nazi. They can almost frame themselves as the antifascists even while all their actions point towards a fascist future.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 9 months ago

That's a very good point. Libs say, 'How can you be a communist, don't you know how bad it was when people tried it?'

(Ignoring the fact that it has always been good, actually, on balance.) The answer is, 'Unlike capitalists, we have no reason to do what failed before.'

Hence why China, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, DPRK have their own problems—but almost none of which are the same as those that happened in the USSR.

It's only liberals who say, 'This is capitalism, tough shit if you don't like it, things will get better in however many years. And yes, we plan to do all the stuff that's always been horrific, thank you. No, I don't understand contradiction, why do you ask?'

As that's built into the bourgeois outlook, they simply cannot comprehend how differently communists think.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 11 points 9 months ago

I think next round we should take everyone's toothbrush.

[-] ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago

“Stealing the toothbrushes is merely Phase 1, Mr. Bond. Little do you know that I have already initiated Phase 2 of my diabolical plan! You fancy yourself a… sexually aroused fellow, wouldn’t you, old chap? Perhaps, dare I say… Horny? Well, my horny British friend, I implore you to see my demonstration. We shall send top officers of mine to follow people around with Horny-Bonk-bats! And everyone will be FORCED to be VolCel!!! Evil Laughter

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Russian government can have reactionary positions when it comes to LGBT issues, and yet still be the main force in the world today killing nazis who would like nothing more than to wipe LGBT people off the face of the earth.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 28 points 9 months ago

Come on, you over there in Dongistan, tell me how Putin is "Based" And will help communism return to Russia?

No one says that, merely that they should be supported as an opponent of the imperial core

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 9 months ago

Should we stop critically supporting Gaza because they have anti-LGBT views also?

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Russia isn’t being bombed back into the Stone Age by a ravaging imperialist power. They don’t deserve sympathy or excuses for takes like this.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 9 months ago

Have you forgotten that the Donbas has been getting bombed by actual western funded nazis since 2014?

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Is that Russia? How does the suffering of the people of Donbas influence the people of Kazan or Volgograd, or the Russian leadership into taking bizarre, disgusting, and reactionary decisions like this?

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 9 months ago

Is that Russia?

As recently as 1991 yes; Its up for them to decide and the consenus in the area has been Russian unification for a while now.

How does the suffering of the people of Donbas influence the people of Kazan or Volgograd, or the Russian leadership into taking bizarre, disgusting, and reactionary decisions like this?

How is occupying a position in the western hegemony, the one who is funding the needless slaughter of east ukraine justification for the uncoupling of support from the people that our governments are killing?

I think that if you sincerely want things to get better for LGBT+ comrades in Russia, which I do; it comes with the war stopping.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

“Things to get better”

This law was passed this past week.

How does the death and destruction in the Donbas justify this reactionary policy? How will the war ending rectify this? Why would they not just continue down this reactionary path?

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 9 months ago

The law passed this week, 10 years into a war with the west.

No ones justifying anything, its a material analysis of the dialectics at play.

War enables right wing reactionary policies to flourish due to unity becoming the priority in the face of a percieved existenstial threat, as such its a given that the fastest route to the war ending is favourable for conditions improving.

And lastly, do you seriously think a forever war will be the better path?

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

A law that is built upon decades of rising hate and discrimination, this is just giving that a rubber stamp. It has been terrible for a while. Watch the Russian news, they speak about the community like vermin and pests.

Why am I to believe that the war ending would rectify this? Would that not invigorate those same right wing policies? They would be proven correct, and be seen as strong, giving them even more ground to build upon.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 months ago

A law that is built upon decades of rising hate and discrimination, this is just giving that a rubber stamp. It has been terrible for a while. Watch the Russian news, they speak about the community like vermin and pests.

Thats why you need to trace this back to 1991, where the justification for this started. The USSR was actually starting to liberalize laws regarding LGBT+ people and I think they would have followed the same timeline as China/Cuba in modern times if that never happened. Thats why the ongoing war is connected to this, because the tensions created with the collapse of the USSR have never been resolved.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I fully agree with you, but that doesn’t answer the question. This is still an unjustifiable and disgusting reactionary path.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 months ago

I agree with you comrade, my position is ceasefire and LGBT+ and communist liberation in Russia; I do see the war as degrading conditions and enabling this path, and I think the route out of it requires a ceasefire and concessions from Ukraine.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago

I truly hope you are right. I agree with your stance, but if we are truthful then all we can say is that only time will tell.

I also I didn’t mean to be hostile with you, this is just a very sore subject, and it’s painful when some people blindly push their “critical” support at any cost, which in this case might happen to be my life. You have not done that however, and I hope you have a good day comrade. Thanks for your responses.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 9 months ago

Some of them literally are, and if NATO wins they will most likely got thrown in even worse nightmare than in 90's because right now natoids openly speaks about balkanisation, setting up warlords and genocide.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Donbas is not Russian land, and that is entirely irrelevant to this situation.

I’m sure leaders in ivory towers discriminating against gay people in Moscow will help the people of Donbas best NATO! Wooo!

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Donbas was Russian for centuries, and certainly wasn't Ukrainian, until Lenin intervened and told them to shut up when they didn't wanted to belong to Ukraine (rare but severe Lenin L), and even then only on paper since they tried to secede two or three times since.

And i don't even understand your point. If you want to be so blunt and reductive, you could say the same about Gaza where LGBT situation is not all roses too. Are we only supposed to support people below certain threshold of military power or numerical disadvantage? Why Russia is so much worse than Iran, DPRK or all other socially conservative countries which we do support more or less critically?

I’m sure leaders in ivory towers discriminating against gay people in Moscow will help the people of Donbas best NATO! Wooo!

It is precisely what is currently happening.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Liberals looove that take. I seen one go as far as to deny evidence of the genocide because "Al Jazeera is funded by Qatar"

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago

I agree that this is a negative devolopment, but my answer is 'stop bombing them'

[-] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 9 months ago

AFAIK the Dongistanis are banned here

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago

Wtf is Dongistan? I can't keep up with all these online splinter groups

[-] olgas_husband@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 9 months ago

sometimes they slip through the cracks and people like pepe escobar is mentioned here. i want to believe that people are unaware of that

[-] Beat_da_Rich@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 9 months ago

It's possible to both recognize how a state (Russia, Iran) can occupy an anti-imperialist position due to their circumstances and also recognize that they have seriously bigoted domestic politics.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Seeing how duginism is called out by name as not being allowed, it's safe to say you aren't going to see any redfash here who support this.

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
97 points (99.0% liked)

World News

2175 readers
15 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS