2550
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] potterman28wxcv@beehaw.org -1 points 11 months ago

I do not get why it would work in that case. I assume the scenario is someone with a bike coming, doing theft, then leaving with the same bike.

Therefore there will be a period without bike, then a period with bike, then a period without bike again.

Let's assume there is no bike on the particular moment viewed. How do you know whether it occured before or after the theft? If you make the wrong decision, you get stuck on an endless binary search.. Unless you take note at each timestamp where you made the decision, draw a tree of timestamps, and go back the tree if your search is fruitless but that's much more complicated than what this post says.

[-] Aatube@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

To me it sounds like they stole the bike.

[-] potterman28wxcv@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks indeed I misunderstood the problem

[-] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 11 months ago

You're making this way more complicated than it actually is. The guy definitely can give estimates for when he parked the bike and when he found out that it was stolen. It's not that complicated.

[-] potterman28wxcv@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

I misunderstood the problem. I thought the thieve came on bike to steal something. I did not get that the bike itself was what got stolen.

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
2550 points (99.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

19622 readers
71 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS