50
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
30 readers
1 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!
founded 1 year ago
I mean, yeah? None of that is unique to threads nor meta and half of that is information required to run the service
Threads Data linked to you
Third-party advertising:
Developer's advertising or marketing:
Analytics:
Product Personalization:
App functionality:
Other purposes:
As compared to Mastadon:
[Blank Space]
Source
And yet the article decided to use 4 things that are inconsequential as their headline topics rather than that list
So you didn't read the article, and just read the headline and lede.
No I read the article and I've seen the rest of the posts here containing the list you mentioned. I was commenting specifically on that line from the article hence why I quoted it
The press is complicit.
Why would they make the article at all then?
People are discussing it, and an article that downplays it will suggest the discussion is overreaction.
But the article doesn't downplay it, it just uses bad examples. You'd have to be technically adept enough to know that the examples were bad whilst also not knowing what meta actually collects
Maybe I'm just paranoid and they're just stupid, then.
I mean, yeah, but this is also true compared to writing your thoughts down in a paper journal or a self-hosted WordPress blog. Comparing it to Mastodon is only meaningful if you're specifically evangelizing for Mastodon. You're preaching to the choir here.
Your source touches on this, but a more meaningful comparison would be the social networks that are already being used by the same demographic. Is Threads use of data excessive or unusual compared the existing apps from Meta or its direct peers? How does it compare to Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Tiktok, Snapchat, etc.? How does it compare to ubiquitous Google apps like YouTube, Gmail, Chrome, etc?
Yeah, excessive tracking is Not Good, but it's nowhere near unique to Threads.
The cybersecurity startup the parent article is built around, Protexxa, have their own Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, etc. as does its founder and CEO.
So what's the point of the article? Why Threads? Why now?
Personally, I think it says a lot that they can’t release it in the EU yet because it gathers so much data. Plus, we know Meta can’t be trusted with people’s data. It’s gathering more than other Meta apps and need to be aware of it.
As far as I know, they didn't want to rush it out in the EU because they didn't know if they'd fall foul of rules or not and they couldn't wait weeks or months just to find out. Not because they can't. Though, ironically, I think federation would cause the biggest problems. (How do you support the right to be forgotten when it's not technically possible?)
I kept a blog for ten years, I didn't write down my health info, my contact info, and my financial info on it.
And attention is being paid to Threads because yes, the access to health info is unusal. Other social media apps haven't asked for that unless they were specifically fitness apps.
It's bad that other ones track stuff, but it's not just stuff anyone puts on the internet just by being there, and they ARE taking an unprecedented step here.
That was my point. It isn't that Mastodon is the alternative to Threads, it's just an alternative. The are plenty of systems of sharing short status updates with people that won't involve as many privacy threats.
Instagram also collects health info, which it has no intrinsic need for. This is important to note because, fundamentally, Threads is Instagram. That's why it collects the same data.
I don't have an Instagram. Man, that's intrusive. I'm glad Threads is getting people to call attention to it.
This was all I had to read to decide the entire article is junk.
You should have read on that it also captures Health and Fitness information. The only reason it would get that is to sell it to insurance companies, or worse, law enforcement if you're in a region that outlaws certain medical procedures.