1723
Some light genocide (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] oce@jlai.lu -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Let's ignore the political opponent massacres of the Great Purge and ideology fueled agricultural disasters of the Great Chinese Famine, and focus on the Holodomor in Ukraine, the Cambodian genocide, the Uyghur genocide in China.
Happened under communist dictatorships that are generally considered to be at the left.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Generally, the left wing is characterized by an emphasis on "ideas such as freedom, equality, fraternity, rights, progress, reform and internationalism" while the right wing is characterized by an emphasis on "notions such as authority, hierarchy, order, duty, tradition, reaction and nationalism".

This guy: This dictatorship is on the left.

[-] oce@jlai.lu -1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what your comment means, but I'm actually saying the opposite of dictatorship being of a specific political side. I'm highlighting the fact that political extremists will end up killing in the name of their ideology, which ever it is, left, right or whatever other cult.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

My comment means a Dictatorship, by definition, isn't left wing.

I’m highlighting the fact that political extremists will end up killing in the name of their ideology

How do you define extremist? It used to be an extremist view to say women should have the right to vote, or people shouldn't own slaves. Hell, Democracy used to be an "extremist" view.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

So someone willing to kill in the name of an ideology is an extremist, but that's the easy extreme case. In general in modern democracies, no politician would admit to that, so the definition is rather relative to how far the political positions of a party are from the average of the last governing parties for a specific country.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So someone willing to kill in the name of an ideology is an extremist

So you're highlighting the fact that extremists will kill people in the name of their ideology, and you define extremists as people who will to kill for their ideology. Sounds pretty tautological no?

[-] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

You're confusing tautology with just writing the same definition in two different orders.
A square has four sides of equal length. Four sides of equal length length make a square. That's not a tautology.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Okay, so you're highlighting the fact that a square has four sides of equal length. Seems rather pointless, no?

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

Dictatorships aren't progressive. I don't even consider them communisms, tbh. How can workers own the means to production if one guy or family owns the nation?

[-] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agree with your last sentence but it is the path all the Marxist revolutions have taken. A reason being that proletariat dictatorship is a step to communism in Marx's ideology. But from history, it seems it just stops at the dictatorship.
So maybe the conclusion is that Marx methodology doesn't actually lead to a progressive/left country.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

There is Kerala, a state in India with 34.6 Million people.

TBF there probably would be more than a few if not for USA intervention, like when they overthrew the Marxist Democratic Socialist Allende of Chile in 1973.

There is also Nepal currently, although they've very recently enacted a constitution in 2015 and score lower than the USA according to DemocracyMatrix they still qualify as a "Deficient Democracy" the same as the USA.

There was also San Marino from 1945 to 1957 where the "Rovereta Affair" ended in a coup and the Christian Nationalist party took control of the government. TBF though they probably would have just had a shitty Stalinist communism just like Turkmenistan did.

I realize most people define communism and socialism as republics in which most if not all goods are public, but I personally like to include nations in which a sizeable number of goods and services are state owned or distributed, which would include a great many democratic nations like Germany or the UK (as long as we agree the crown has no real political authority in the UK).

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
1723 points (89.6% liked)

Political Memes

5509 readers
2432 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS