94
submitted 10 months ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Archive: [ https://archive.ph/sbbmw ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I suspect the reason they didn't take it is more of internal politics, the current government is synonymous with war and growing more and more unpopular as fatigue and stalemate sets in. They don't understand what drives US foreign policy; The US keeps telling Ukraine to avoid striking at Russia itself, and moderating the flow of equipment so Ukraine never gets too successful.

The United States doesn't want Ukraine to lose but they really really don't want Russia to lose either, because that would cause instability (and god knows what could happen when the government of a nuclear superpower collapses). Like, when prigozhin was doing his thunder run to Moscow, they specifically told Ukraine not to rock the boat, even though that's when Russia was at its most vulnerable with its command structure in total disarray/panic.

In general I feel like they just want the Ukraine conflict to simmer down already so they can focus on China (and also now that it's about to erupt, on the middle east).

[-] crackajack@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

The Ukraine war reached to a standstill, discouraging others to give further support and prosecuting the war. But anything can still happen in the next couple of months.

It's hard to say whether it was a good idea to capitalise on Prigozhin's coup at the time. The problem with the fog of war is that everyone's vision is hindered. And when look back and say we should have done this and that, someone will say hindsight is 20/20.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
94 points (95.2% liked)

World News

32117 readers
690 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS