756
submitted 1 year ago by Custoslibera@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] art@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We've had gpg signatures for ages. No block chain needed.

[-] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Bold statement.

I would argue that just because something that could work doesn't mean it is the best fit for the job for one reason or another.

We have multiple programming languages, database, filesystem, media formats etc...etc... Those also generally perform the same thing but some do certain things better and you pick whatever one best fits your needs.

why can block chain and go both existing and fit whatever role best fits them?

Not saying block chain / NFTs are the answer to ownership tracking just saying we shouldn't write them off just because something else might work.

[-] art@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

New technologies are great but sometimes you're just reinventing the wheel by creating a more complicated and energy expensive wheel.

[-] fosho@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

can these be held and traded in a verifiable way?

[-] art@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. Old signatures can be included in a new signature.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
756 points (95.7% liked)

Memes

45555 readers
769 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS