81
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by iridaniotter@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857

No, the art does not depict bestiality, don't worry.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] booty@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

uhhhh that's just (unfortunately) very well-documented to be false. like, extremely well documented.

edit: also that's an incomprehensible answer to the question. why would something being impossible make it wrong? I don't think it would be morally wrong to sidestep through the 8th dimension to get to work faster

I don’t think it would be morally wrong to sidestep through the 8th dimension to get to work faster

I recently had an argument with my boss when something similar was said, so they would steal even more of your labour.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i guarantee someone would have a moral stance against teleportation if it existed. but it doesn't so i don't very much care to speculate.

but handfuls of unverified and whispered-about videos doesn't constitute 'extreme' documentation, i'd welcome an actual study proving there's more than dozens of actual bestia--uh--tists? and a widespread occurrence of the act, but i know of no such studies and no opinions on it that aren't painted by the cultural baggage attached

it's akin to people wingsuit flying through a suspension bridge and getting cheese-grated, there's certainly footage of it and it was a bad idea but i don't think it's a very pressing concern for most people

[-] booty@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

so, bestiality is wrong because you can't do it, in other words it's impossible. therefore the people who have done it on video are evil because they're doing something impossible. huey-wut

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

my op was 99.99%, that is not absolute, i was never making an absolute rule, my claim is that discourses about bestiality are mostly talking about the imaginary and fetishes but failing to recognize that. the article/tweet we're talking about is a thinly disguised sexual fantasy with no interface with material reality. and people itt are conflating that with the extraordinarily rare real world acts, that are nothing like that sexual fantasy.

in the 'article' they're imagining a consensual sexual relationship with a dog, which the dog consents to. this is impossible not just from a dog's faculty to consent, but because dogs do not experience sexual attraction to humans. if a male dog has ever fucked people, which i seriously doubt, it'd be through transparently nonconsensual training or something. it's not a real argument or a real situation, and i think it's silly when people give it the airs of a moral debate

[-] booty@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

if a male dog has ever fucked people, which i seriously doubt

ok, so you're just talking from a position of ignorance. when i say this is extremely well-documented, i mean that there used to be a subreddit called /r/sexwithdogs where people were posting hundreds of videos of precisely this.

it'd be through transparently nonconsensual training or something

this is true, yeah, you have to groom animals for stuff like this, just like any other vulnerable party.

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

if a male dog has ever fucked people, which i seriously doubt, it'd be through transparently nonconsensual training or something.

When I was growing up, we had a family dog that was constantly humping legs. This isn't a defense, mind, since "but they made the first move" isn't any more justifiable with animals than it is with children, but it does happen.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

i think it's a long way from leg-hump (which isn't sexual in all situations, it's often about dominance) to fucking an animal with incompatible morphology, wrong pheromones, and incorrect behavior

[-] GreenTeaRedFlag@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

you've never seen a dog hump someone's leg?

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

a leg is not analogous to someone's sex organs?

[-] GreenTeaRedFlag@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

If someone rubbed a dick on your leg that would definitely be a form of assault. There's at least one sex organ involved here, the dogs.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
81 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15911 readers
6 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS