246
submitted 11 months ago by original_reader@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Womble@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Infrastructure needs central backing, that's not exactly controversial. Would you rather each individual company has to fund its own chargers and end up with a patchwork that only works for each brand individually (and probably change over time to not support older models). Thats how the railways initially developed in 19th century Britain and it was a horrible mess of privately owned incompatible gauges.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Or maybe the government could take care of it themselves since the private sector can't be bothered.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

I'd rather businesses that require government funding to operate to be owned by the government.

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Great, so would I. Doesn't change the fact that in the here and now they aren't and we cant wait for a great socialist revolution to start addressing climate change.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

It doesn't take a great socialist revolution, and nations won't stop using fossil fuels as long as they remain cheaper than other options.

Other options won't be cheaper until we run out of easily-extractable oil.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
246 points (98.4% liked)

World News

32159 readers
707 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS