335

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders said Sunday he doesn’t know that a ceasefire is possible in the Israel-Hamas war with “an organization like Hamas” involved.

“I don’t know how you can have a ceasefire, (a) permanent ceasefire, with an organization like Hamas, which is dedicated to turmoil and chaos and destroying the state of Israel,” Sanders told CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union” Sunday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

If your reaction to something Bernie said or did is "fuck you", you should read more. He said that the bombings need to stop ASAP, then the whole world needs to help things progress to a two-state solution.

[-] WuTang@lemmy.ninja 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“I don’t know how you can have a ceasefire, (a) permanent ceasefire, with an organization like Hamas, which is dedicated to turmoil and chaos and destroying the state of Israel,

This is pretty clear to me. this fallacy of saying "destroying the state of Israel", which is

  1. impossible - this a high-end military state
  2. this is Israel which is fucking destroying palestine, there is no more factual than this.
  3. hamas* or whatever you call it today is just "replying" to this fact

As far as I know, this is not Israeli which get their water/food/electricity/movement/borders controlled, this is not Israeli under the bombs, this is not Israeli moving to the south...

So Bernie... we can't even talk kind of chessmaster rhetoric ("ya know, he critics Israel behind"), this is pure cowardice if not dishonesty (by its affiliation)

*cause of course, Isreal is creating generation of - legit - haters

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

He kind of has a point. The idea that a permanent ceasefire with Hamas is impossible has some merit. The keyword here is permanent, that any ceasefire will eventually collapse and lead to this situation happening again. Then he clarifies what should be done instead.

I don't agree with him on this point, don't get me wrong, but the point seems to be that a return to pre-Oct 7 conditions won't do any favors for everybody. He says this too in the article:

“The immediate task right now is to end the bombing,” Sanders said Sunday, “to end the horrific humanitarian disaster, to build – go forward with the entire world for a two-tier, two-state solution to the crisis to give the Palestinian people hope.”

That's a pretty agreeable position.

[-] WuTang@lemmy.ninja 1 points 1 year ago

Again, you are ignoring the context. This is not Hamas - or whatever you call it today - a population is getting decimated on a faster pace right now! 7 Oct was tragic (still, not everything has been investigated yet and we know Israeli's trend to inflate shit) but it CAN'T be drawn as a sacred milestone which could erase all the previous and atrocious forfeits, should I say "crimes", committed by Israel.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean he says the bombing needs to end and has voted as much in the Senate.. He's definitely not claiming Israel is in any way innocent.

We're falling into the trap of "Do you condemn Hamas" here. Not any mention of Hamas needs to be accompanied by a condemnation of Israel, just as not every mention of Israel needs to come with a condemnation of Hamas.

[-] WuTang@lemmy.ninja 1 points 1 year ago

We’re falling into the trap of “Do you condemn Hamas” here.

Not at all, I see what you mean but no. The "relation" is irrelevant here. Who has the power, the control and who is dying?

[-] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

That's such a simplistic view though, how long would you ignore a country firing missiles at you and sneaking in to kill civilians? Israel spent staggering sums on defensive security rather than just carpet bombing and still they find ways to kill Israelies.

And they always will, the leader of Hamas went to Iran again the other day to talk about further support that Iran can give them - they already train Palestinian fighters, supply them with missiles, scuba suits, paragliders, and tunnel making equipment. This isn't just a small city being bullied it's a proxy war, and yeah there are people in Palestine who don't support Hamas but it's not just Israel that's too blame for their bad experience - fundamentalist despots need them to be there suffering and dying so they can have a reason to keep attacking Israel, so they can hold Israel up as a bogeyman to cement their power at home.

This isn't a simple situation, Israel can't just stop fighting and tear down it's walls.

[-] WuTang@lemmy.ninja 0 points 1 year ago

firing missiles

Anoooother inflate. talking about missile (which are guided and of higher destruction capacity) while the others use artisanal rocketry, shows a level of cowardice, jeez... And if you are so fucked up that, a death, if arab should only interest their ethnic, be aware that Iran is persian and shite, not arab and sunnite like... ya know, Saudi Arabia, Liban or Jordania OR Egypt!

Just look a the fucking map. The reality Israel is theocratic state (pseudo democratic, Bibi refers often to the book), laws are based on Talmud and they cry to build their great Israel.

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
335 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS