441
submitted 8 months ago by leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I don't know if this is 100% strictly privacy related but I think it does fall in the sphere of protecting one's right to express oneself privately.

"Government officials have drawn up deeply controversial proposals to broaden the definition of extremism to include anyone who “undermines” the country’s institutions and its values, according to documents seen by the Observer.

The new definition, prepared by civil servants working for cabinet minister Michael Gove, is fiercely opposed by a cohort of officials who fear legitimate groups and individuals will be branded extremists.

The proposals have provoked a furious response from civil rights groups with some warning it risks “criminalising dissent”, and would significantly suppress freedom of expression."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 7 points 8 months ago

These things are multifaceted.

Privacy? Hell no.

Healthcare? Absolutely (though trending the wrong direction)

Public transport? Better, though again heading the wrong way.

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
441 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

29831 readers
678 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS