this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
28 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23081 readers
5 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have heard that it is anti semetic to "deny israel has a right to exist"

Which makes me curious. Is it a generally accepted premise either in law or just by people that countries have "rights"?

I think of rights as something people have.

If countries do have rights, is exisiting one of them?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm certainly not a geopolitics professional but I can't think of any other nation that people claim has a "right" to exist. The closest thing I can think of as far as Westerners trying to argue legitimacy would Taiwan, maybe? But I don't think I've ever seen it defended as having some innate right to existence.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

iirc some people used to say some kind of kurdistan has the right to exist but nato-cool doesn't care about them anymore so i haven't heard about rojava or anything for several years

none of the more established nation-states act like they're under existential threat as the zionists do, so it doesn't really come up. I think the primary purpose of the argument is to whitewash israel's atrocities and it doesn't have much to say about geopolitics.

Oh yeah, I think you're right. I'm surprised we don't hear East Turkestan has a right to exist, now that I think about it