this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
28 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23081 readers
15 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have heard that it is anti semetic to "deny israel has a right to exist"

Which makes me curious. Is it a generally accepted premise either in law or just by people that countries have "rights"?

I think of rights as something people have.

If countries do have rights, is exisiting one of them?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glans@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree. My question was less about Israel having this right. I am wondering if "has the right to exist" is discussed about any other country or if it was created just for this situation.

Do Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Ireland or any other have "the right to exist"?

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm certainly not a geopolitics professional but I can't think of any other nation that people claim has a "right" to exist. The closest thing I can think of as far as Westerners trying to argue legitimacy would Taiwan, maybe? But I don't think I've ever seen it defended as having some innate right to existence.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

iirc some people used to say some kind of kurdistan has the right to exist but nato-cool doesn't care about them anymore so i haven't heard about rojava or anything for several years

none of the more established nation-states act like they're under existential threat as the zionists do, so it doesn't really come up. I think the primary purpose of the argument is to whitewash israel's atrocities and it doesn't have much to say about geopolitics.

Oh yeah, I think you're right. I'm surprised we don't hear East Turkestan has a right to exist, now that I think about it