696
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

YouTube is increasing Premium prices in multiple countries, right after an ad-blocker crackdown | You either pay rightfully for the video content you consume, or you live with the ads.::Google is increasing the prices of YouTube Premium and YouTube Music Premium subscriptions in some regions, right after blocking ad-blockers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 40 points 1 year ago

Yeah, no.. it's already overpriced.

Paramount + £6.99 Netflix £10.99 (standard) Youtube £12

Makes no sense.. they don't have anything like the production overheads. Stuff like Star Trek and Stranger Things are expensive. '10 greatest cat videos' is not.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 16 points 1 year ago

Heck, they don't even pay a good fraction of their bandwidth because they put caching box in your ISP location to reduce loads. This is a huge privilege as ISPs won't let any random companies run equipments for free in their network, which is one of a huge barrier for any YouTube competitors.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

They might be allowing them to run the boxes for free, but the ISPs are saving money on bandwidth, too.

Get enough users for the ISP to care and they'll work with you. Otherwise, you probably don't have all that many users to begin with, so the overhead that maintaining and distributing these boxes would create wouldn't be worth it anyway.

[-] nnjethro@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Youtube expenses is revenue share with creators and hosting untold hours of video, over 500 hours uploaded per minute, that others just don't have to deal with.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

It "makes sense" in that, unlike those two, YT has to deal with thousands of hours of video being uploaded to their servers every minute. What they don't pay in streaming rights, they pay in storage and bandwidth costs, plus a couple of peanuts for "moderation", which is probably more expensive in the long run

[-] zwaetschgeraeuber@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

you forgot to add spotify which is about 12$

[-] Lord_Logjam@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

YouTube Music is included with YouTube Premium though so no need for Spotify if you have YTP.

[-] zwaetschgeraeuber@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

yes. thats why i was saying they forgot spotify price in their calculation its still pretty ok price for ytp in relation to spotifys new price jump.

[-] Lord_Logjam@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Ah I see, fair point

[-] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Depends on how much you use it. I watch Youtube pretty much every day for at least an hour, while using Netflix or other streaming services about once evey few months. I use Spotify every day too, just because I like their app more in some ways.

[-] Atomdude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If I had to choose, I'd swap my Netflix and Disney+ subscriptions for YouTube. I think I watch YouTube videos about three times as much as Netflix and Disney.

[-] ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Well it also includes a streaming music service which are normally $10/m on their own.

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I already pay for Spotify. They knew exactly what they were doing when they lumped that shit in YouTube premium

[-] indianactresslover@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They should offer it seperately.

[-] kirk781@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

IIRC, YouTube Music is also offered as a standalone service, Atleast in some countries. However, the difference b/w YouTube Premium and just the Music service comes out to be miniscule, so folks just pay for the former.

[-] indianactresslover@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, I want Premium without Music. It's not offered anywhere.

Same thing with Amazon. I want Prime without Prime Video. It's not offered either.

[-] kirk781@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, I understand now, especially the second one. The only thing from Amazon's product line worth using to me is the Prime delivery service. I can't give two hoots about their Prime Music( which I lost respect for after it denied to run for me on any browser on Linux for some reason) or Prime Video.

[-] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can't see the value in using youtube for music.. it's not like I can watch music videos in my car. That's worth $0 to me, and I imagine the majority. Spotify is better.. or apple music if you're on the fruit side.

[-] ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Youtube music doesn't have music videos, not sure what you are talking about. It's just a clone of play music after they shut it down.

[-] gsfraley@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Fwiw, it's not videos, it's a Spotify clone.

[-] KepBen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you've already got a solution for ad-free music in your car, sure, obviously. Not everybody has that though.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
696 points (93.6% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
3023 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS