442
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by yakultdrinkr to c/world@lemmy.world
  • Hamas-run government says Israeli strikes on Jabalia refugee camp in Gaza killed at least 195 Palestinians, with concerns raised by the UN that these could constitute war crimes.
  • Evacuation of foreign nationals from Gaza is underway, with 320 already crossed into Egypt; about 7,500 are expected to leave within two weeks.
  • The strikes targeted Hamas military leaders and infrastructure, with Israel’s campaign responding to Hamas' cross-border attacks from Oct. 7.
  • U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is set to visit Israel and Jordan to discuss the conflict and the need to minimize civilian casualties.

Media Bias Fact Check (Reuters):

Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Actual Reuters headline:

Hamas says Israel's strikes on refugee camp kill more than 195 people

OP’s headline :

Gaza says Israel's strikes on refugee camp kill more than 195 people

[-] bpmd@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

URL says Gaza, Reuters changed the headline after it was posted.

[-] yakultdrinkr 46 points 1 year ago

No editorializing from me. Reuters changed the title after I submitted the post. You can see it cached by Photon here:

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] febra@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I don't see a problem here. I trust their numbers. They have released lists with all the people killed by Israel before and parts of those lists were confirmed by relatives living abroad. "Hamas-run X,Y,Z" is just a cheap way of trying to delegitimize palestinian deaths.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Gaza's Hamas-run media office

Its weird seeing both Hamas and non-Hamas government related bodies. Kind of confusing juggling Gaza without Hamas, Gaza with Hamas, and Hamas's militant wing specifically.

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hamas is the defacto government of Palestine for close to ten years now. It's hard to untangle because they are genuinely intertwined. There isn't a significant difference between "government of Gaza" and "Hamas".

[-] HumbertTetere@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

There's more to Palestine than Gaza, so while your 3rd sentence is very much true and more central to the issue at hand, the first one is quite incorrect and might lead people to forget about Abbas/Fatah.

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hamas is literally the elected government of Palestine. They are the authority in Gaza that releases these numbers.

Correction: Hamas is the government body of Gaza, not of all Palestine, which includes the West Bank.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hamas is literally the elected government of Palestine.

Hamas is the government of Gaza, not all of Palestine. Palestine also includes the west bank which is under Fatah/PA leadership, they lost a civil war to Hamas in Gaza after Hamas was elected there. They haven't held another election since.

Thank you for the correction, I have edited accordingly.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You could also correct the part about them being voted in. They had around 40% of the votes in a multiparty election, kicked out their opposers and took over. The current population of Gaza is 50% under 18, most people don't live beyond 65 due to low life expectancy, and that last election was 16 years ago. They were not democratically elected and the majortiy of Gazans haven't voted for them.

That's how voting works literally everywhere. If you count the people that don't or can't vote, American Presidents are elected by like twenty percent of the population, and the winner doesn't even have to get a majority of the actual votes.

The statement that they were voted in is a true statement, so I see no reason to correct it because you don't like that fact.

[-] snek@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They won seats but never formed a proper government. Sure it's a true statement if you want to be pedantic but it's missing the relevant context. It's not a nice and decent election in a normal and nice environment (thanks to Israel).

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

True, but it’s not like that election wasn’t ripe with controversy around its legitimacy. At the very least there was notable voter intimidation being practiced by a militarized group.

I'm certainly not endorsing the Hamas leadership of Gaza or their legitimacy, but the fact remains that there isn't a real distinction between "Gaza leaders" and "Hamas" at this point.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thag sucks. But maybe it's Reuters changing their headlines?

[-] yakultdrinkr 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right. Reuters changed it after this was posted.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So we are suppose to trust them equally as with that hospital attack.

[-] Sparlock@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Hamas never made that claim.

It was a doctor being interviewed by al-jazeera. Even then it was a mis-translation of what he said that western media just ran with and never fact checked.

Please stop spreading misinformation to serve as a way to delegitimize one side. There are plenty of REAL facts you can use.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
442 points (92.0% liked)

World News

39004 readers
421 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS