156
I would just quit. (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LGOrcStreetSamurai@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One thing I find very strange about the actually existing information age is that most "tech" doesn't even solve a problem, or improve upon an existing system. It's all just selling solutions to problems you don't have or problems the seller created in order to sell you the solution. Most "tech" companies haven't really made any improvements to anything they own in a long time. It think the it's odd/frustrating that improvement to existing solutions is far less "valuable" than new "features".

It's also interesting to me that "tech" companies aren't even really technology companies anymore. "Innovation" is just a buzzword rather than actual goal/objective. They want to just make new "things" rather than actually improving any current things

The modern age is weird and I don't like it.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago

That's the problem with humans having limited needs while the market needs unlimited growth. The only answer after a certain point is inventing demand.

[-] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

for example computer chips are now cheap enough to put inside household appliances it just turns out that almost no one needs or wants that

we could use this to create technology to assist the disabled and elderly caring for themselves but that's not a big enough market so stupid bullshit it is

I would have bought so much IoT stuff if they were designed to use open standards and be part of an isolated home network. They could have had a sizable if niche prosumer market, but these companies wanna go public or get acquired, so that’s not enough.

Like home security cameras are fine if part of a isolated network, but instead we get people broadcasting the inside of their homes to these tech companies that watch the footage and hand it over to the cops proactively.

[-] LGOrcStreetSamurai@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

we could use this to create technology to assist the disabled and elderly caring for themselves but that's not a big enough market so stupid bullshit it is

It's really frustrating that we have the know-how and resources to make technologies for making all sorts of people's lives safer/easier/better but because it's not "profitable" we don't. It's really maddening to me that we have all the assets and knowledge but not the will due to "THE MARKET©®™" deems it to be unprofitable.

yeah it's pretty deeply tragic like the people dying in Africa of diseases that there are cures and vaccines for but copyright law and the fact they aren't a big enough market to justify the cost of setting up a factory to make the medicine they need means they just die

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

And specifically, inventing demand by removing alternatives. Like with IoT devices. They invent demand by removing alternative designs, raise the price because it's premium, then use those devices to spy on your and sell data to create a sort of rent based model where you pay with your privacy.

Alternatively they just refuse to even sell you the IoT device and force you to rent it from them.

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

IoT stuff is so frustrating, because the useful aspects are overwhelmed by the need to make it profitable. I DIY'd an environment tracking setup totally local on my network to keep track of things like temp/humidity because I've got some sensitive acoustic instruments and I need to know when they need to go in their case/get a wet sponge/break out the dehumidifier. Now I have a historical graph of temp/humidity/air quality cycles in my apartment.

I bought a "IoT" power strip because I wanted individually addressable outlets for things like lamps and monitors and centralize the interface but fuckin TPlink took away the python API access and requires an account and so it sits in its box until I can possibly reverse engineer it enough to either write my own firmware or just hotwire the relays for my own purposes.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Could you get around that API limitation by routing control through OpenHAB or Home Assistant?

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

The only way to control it currently is via an app you need an account for so it removes any ability to be an offline device. Its within my skillset to dump the flash and try to patch it, it should be running some embedded linux firmware going by the mediatek chip in the FCC declarations.

I've just had other stuff going on and didn't feel like dealing with it after the initial disapointment. There is the possibility of regaining the python api but that still requires making a tp-link account and connecting the device to the internet period, so I'm not a fan.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

I'm sad that there aren't more "generic" devices out there that just use standard free protocols

[-] Kynuck97@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

For real, so many proprietary applications that will almost certainly just lose support within the decade, rendering the device useless if it can only be used with that particular app.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly, and the apps usually suck. I'm planning on just buying a bunch of ESP32 chips and some relays and building my own out of regular powerstrips. I already have a hacky digital switch I spliced into my 3d printer power chord, can't be too hard to slap one in line with a commercial power strip.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

They invent demand by removing alternative designs, raise the price because it's premium, then use those devices to spy on your and sell data to create a sort of rent based model where you pay with your privacy.

I HATE SMART TVS

I HATE SMART TVS

[-] LGOrcStreetSamurai@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Great point man! I didn't even think of it to that sort of scale/perspective.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

For what it's worth, it's not at all an original observation on my part, you can find it in Marx and co and in later writers like Guy Debord.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

One thing I find very strange about the actually existing information age is that most "tech" doesn't even solve a problem, or improve upon an existing system.

One glaring example of this as an ongoing process is involuntary software updates that make the software worse by making it more intrusive, obnoxious, and often jamming more ads into it.

[-] LGOrcStreetSamurai@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Fuckin’ exactly dude!

[-] M68040@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Just kind of reinventing the wheel (but worse). A series of systems that have begun to turn ingrown

[-] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When Twitter came out, there were blogs. Everyone could write articles on their blog, ans RSS allowed everyone to follow anyone.

Then a new company said : "We will make blogs, but limited to 127 characters"

That was so stupid. I bet with a friend that it will never be a thing. I lost.

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
156 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23265 readers
121 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS