536
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 268 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At least 22 dead and 60 wounded.

To all of you out there who want no gun control. This blood is on your hands. Screw you and your 2nd amendment "rights."

Edit: 18 dead, 13 wounded

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 144 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Still waiting for the good guy with a gun they keep repeating

EDIT: OK everyone, yes he was the good guy with a gun. Thanks to everyone for pointing this out

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 116 points 1 year ago

Apparently, the shooter was a firearms instructor. Aka, good guy with a gun turned bad guy with a gun.

This crap will never end until the tools they use to kill are off the streets.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago

Apparently, the shooter was a firearms instructor.

Every gun owner thinks they're a responsible gun owner.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] variaatio@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which is the key problem. Everyone is a "responsible gun owner" and "good guy with a gun"...... until sometimes they suddenly aren't anymore. At which point your protection is what was person able to keep under normal circumstances aka what they had in their possession on the moment they had a mental snap.

Was it a semi-auto shoot as fast as your finger pulls rifle with potentially hundreds of rounds in quick swap magazines or do they have a manual action hunting rifle or shotgun with fixed magazine, that need to be manually reloaded.

Do they have a pistol with again potentially hundreds of rounds of quick reload ammunition or don't or maybe a target pistol with fixed magazine.

That is why places around the world have magazine and type restrictions, since they exactly know "checking backgrounds isn't fool proof and now amount of background checking helps again sudden newly emerging situation after the checks have been done".

Sure that 5 round moose hunting rifle will absolutely wreck say those 5 people, but one can't exactly run amock shooting around endlessly with moose rifle. Damage limitation. 5 dead people is better situation, than 22 dead people. As cold calculating as that is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

cough cough Uvalde cough

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

didn't come because his mother aborted him /s

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Yesterday the right said this WAS a good guy. Just let that sink in.

[-] UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world 15 points 1 year ago

This guy is exactly the kind of person that the GOP considers a "good guy with a gun". He is a mentally ill veteran firearms instructor. Sounds like a boilerplate Trump supporter. Exactly who they want to have more guns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Army vet and gun instructor... This was the good guy

[-] Polar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

There was a study published from data from the last like.. 10 years, I believe, that show that people with guns are more likely to run away, and people WITHOUT guns, are more likely to jump in and try to stop the shooter.

So ya. These good guys with guns are just pussies that never actually use them for good.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Predicting a failure in background checks here allowing him to get a gun:

Edit

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/family-maine-shooting-suspect-says-mental-health-deteriorated-rapidly-rcna122353

"The weapon believed to have been used in the attack was a sniper rifle with .308 caliber bullets, and it was purchased legally this year, officials said."

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/lewiston-maine-shooting-robert-card-what-know-rcna122262

"Maine court records show that a man named Robert Card who was born on the same date as the person of interest was charged with speeding in 2001 and 2002. No other criminal records were listed in the state's electronic court records system or in several other public records databases."

But also:

"It added that law enforcement said Card 'recently reported mental health issues to include hearing voices and threats to shoot up the National Guard Base in Saco, ME.'

The bulletin said Card was reported to have been committed to a mental health facility for two weeks this summer and then released. NBC News has not been able to independently verify the bulletin's statements about Card's history."

In previous incidents, people committed to mental health facilities didn't have it turn up on their background check unless it was ordered by a judge. That needs to change.

I'm seeing varying reports that he was also convicted of domestic abuse, but this link shows no such charges.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Anyone hearing voices needs to have their guns immediately seized.

[-] TeraFloppy@lemmings.world 30 points 1 year ago

That would violate the 1st amendment right to religion.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As the late great Christopher Hitchens once said (paraphrasing here):

When god hears you that's prayer. When you hear god that's mental illness.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is a common misconception.

If you talk to the imaginary being in the sky that is sane and you should be able to buy a tank or a machine gun.

If the imaginary being in the sky talks to you, you are a crazy person and should be limited to 6 rifles or less.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but since no further help will be forthcoming, who will admit to it?

[-] ours@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

But my dog told me it was OK for me to keep a rifle.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world 16 points 1 year ago

Not very many people have argued that people who have actually made violent threats and been institutionalized should be buying guns.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

The 5th Circuit Court (with at least one judge appointed by Trump) has ruled that removing the guns from a violent domestic abuser violates his rights: https://www.texastribune.org/2023/02/09/guns-domestic-abuse-second-amendment/

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

This guy was a firearms instructor. Literally a good guy with a gun turned into a bad guy with a gun.

[-] UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world 26 points 1 year ago

The key point is that he was also recently institutionalized after making threats and SHOULD have had his guns seized, even under existing law.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Agreed, but we haven't been enforcing red flag laws consistently since people start bitching about "mah rites" whenever you try to disarm someone threatening to kill their ex-GF.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The referenced law isn't "red flag laws," those are something else in which simply reporting "my roomate or ex said bad things, proof? No why would I need that, take the guns first due process second, you heard Trump!"

Problem is, people do have rights, and as such before you can violate them you have to actually have a reason, like "them being involuntarily commited for hearing vioces and expressing homicidal ideation."

Red flag laws are written in such a way that your roomate can call them on you because he's mad you ate the last Oreo™, so the cops come and take your right to own guns after a secret hearing you weren't invited to, but it's ok because you will have the almost impossible opportunity to prove "nuh uh" in court 1 year after the date of arbitrary confiscation, unfortunately by then the cops may have already "destroyed" (read: stolen) the property they're now supposed to return so even if you do win that case: Oh well, no punishment for the cops, they can shoot innocent people with impunity, you think they'll get talked to for theft?

Of course that gets pushback, just like any other bad idea Trump supported (albeit from a different group in this case). Most people are however fine with the law we already have that could have prevented this, problem is people need to do their goddamn job and should have taken his shit/input his commital to NICs.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

What was his ratemyprofessor rating?

[-] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 year ago

Gallows humor really does hit different when your 2 hours into doom scrolling lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

True, but continuing to vote for representatives who refuse to have any conversation about gun control still makes them complicit in this behavior.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (162 replies)
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
536 points (96.9% liked)

News

23287 readers
3739 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS