751
Remote employees ‘don’t work as hard’, says head of world’s biggest commercial landlord
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
751 points (96.2% liked)
News
21695 readers
2951 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The evidence says otherwise. He can go fuck himself. I personally prefer going in but I understand people wanting to work from home or at the very least do hybrid work. Childcare is fucking expensive and if you can work while watching kids, that can really help combat the massive rise in housing costs.
Remote work is not free babysitting time. A competent remote work policy will specify that child care is not a part of remote work.
If you can do it without impacting productivity and not get caught then it's probably fine though.
I would not recommend it based on my experience. Remote full time since 2020 and a parent
Remote work offers significantly more flexibility especially if both parents work remote. Many are able to work it just fine. It may not work for you but there are a ton of people that are just as productive when given that flexibility.
I have not seen any remote work policy mention childcare at all.
Many people don't read the policies they agree to, but I did and it is in that remote work policy. Specified that remote work is not a substitute for child care.
I have read several remote work policies in the past few jobs I have had. Zero of them mentioned childcare.
Well get ready for it because people in C-level positions that write policy tend to participate in industry collaboration, and it will likely be standard before long. It's a sensible requirement to make sure your employees are not wasting paid work time on personal tasks. You don't have to like it but that is the truth.
It's an idiotic requirement which is unenforceable. They can't exactly monitor that. Any company pushing for that sounds like they don't have a clue in how to measure their employees' performances.
Again, what I said is the truth even if you don't like it. It's entirely possible to detect when some employees are watching their kids while at work, and if that was against company policy the employee could be sanctioned. Here's an example, an employee is on a conference call with their child in the background, and information available indicates that they are the only person home with the child, therefore they are either providing childcare or neglecting their child.
A parent with a small child under school age should not be watching their kid while working, because it takes a lot of attention to supervise those small children, when work should be the focus of their attention. Older kids who are self-sufficient would be a different situation.
Except that is not the truth as indicated in my experience of it not being mentioned in the several jobs I have had where I worked remote. I'm sorry that that bursts your bubble but that's the truth. In fact I have been on conference calls where there has been a child present and nobody gave a shit since the person was also extremely productive. Again, if it is not affecting productivity, it is a non issue and it sounds like your managers need to learn that basic fact and figure out how to measure very basic KPIs.
There are some cases where it is absolutely not going to affect performance at all for most people. If both parents work from home, they have much more flexibility in handing off interacting with their child. Some parents might have difficulty finding full time daycare or affording it. They still have core hours when they can focus but may also need some flexibility. Those two scenarios are not going to result in decreased productivity for most employees because they can shift some of their work to other hours.
Dude you're not "bursting" anyone's "bubble" with your opinion here. I simply informed you of some facts, and you can ignore them if you please at your own risk.
You have a very loose definition of the word "facts" and show zero evidence backing what you say up.