this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
169 points (98.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5245 readers
348 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The unprecedented die-off represents roughly 90 percent of the eastern Bering Sea population

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lntl@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

the argument is there are winners and losers. these are chosen, evolution isn't simply a competitive, efficient, marketplace of genetics.

this hasn't changed

[–] yenahmik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are chosen

By what exactly?

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

you obviously know the answer already and it's not an efficient marketplace of genetics...

While i don't think Darwin is wrong outright like some Jesus folks would say. A critique i have is that model is simple enough and accurate enough that simple people can understand it and feel like they know something... but it's not quite sophisticated enough to describe all of the forces at play.