this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23252 readers
365 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • What do you think the percentage is of Americans who throws out good food (even junk food) based on the expiration date? I mean - they do so not because the food might be stale but because they believe it suddenly became possibly toxic to eat.

  • What's the percentage for non-food stuff like soap? The other day I noticed my liquid hand soap has an expiration date for whatever reason. I better hurry up - I only have two years left of it being safe.

I started thinking about it after I read this...

"Good thing I read the labels and dates before I opened or ate anything. I avoided potential food poisoning and/or a trip to urgent care by paying attention."

It's from an Amazon review. After they checked the label - they learned the package was delivered with an expiration date two weeks past. They are talking about a Ruffles potato chip variety pack.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ForgetPrimacy@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Expiration dates, as I understand them, are a date which the producer has expended some effort to prove the product won't harm you within some day. If you're trying to prove the milk won't be bad a month from the cow tit, it's not so hard or expensive. If you're trying to prove the potato chips won't harm you a month from packaging, also not hard.

If you're trying to prove a salt shaker won't harm you five years after packaging, even if there is no biological or chemical process we know of that might have caused the salt to magically become toxic, a company can't put an expiration date thru haven't proved.

In cases like the potato chips, it probably costs less to eat the loss of all chip baggies that haven't sold in six months than it would have cost to prove they wouldn't cause harm for longer. Even if an understanding of the involved biological and chemical processes would imply the product would never actually expire, to print an expiration date there must be some degree of proof by experimentation showing the product causes no harm after that period of time.

PSA: I don't know what I'm talking about, I'm summarizing a reddit comment I read probably a decade ago.