this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
641 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31815 readers
3009 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer is facing a potentially serious challenge to his hold on power as momentum builds behind Chris Van Hollen, with the Maryland senator now reportedly open to a run for majority leader.

A movement to draft Van Hollen to challenge Schumer is gaining steam, according to Politico Playbook, which reported Monday that two people close to the effort said it was underway.

A person familiar with Van Hollen’s thinking told the outlet that the senator has “received an outpouring of calls and is now in active listening mode.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 127 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

How is Schuner not considered a generational failure after 2024?

They lost a supermajority to a convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, and the star of the Epstein files.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Do you remember the 2016 DNC convention shenanigans?

Pepperidge Farms remembers.

The committee holds all the power in there, and the DNC is about as from "Democratic" as you could find. Fuck the super-delegate system, etc. etc. etc.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

To play devil's advocate, the super-delegate system wasn't decisive in Hillary's victory. Jacobin has a good article on this that's for some reason a pain in the ass to find, but the short of it is that 2020 was actually worse on the ratfucking front. Aside from the usual bullshit with mainstream media and funding, one thing they did was be deliberately irresponsible with primary dates in the middle of the pandemic to depress turnout, which favored Biden at the cost of literally getting their constituents killed.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And 2024 was basically a kingmaker play when there was an actual convention coming up after they convinced Biden to step down. Could have had a democratic selection of the candidate then, but fuck no.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

"Primaries are when you get to challenge from the left!"

DNC:

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The current DNC Chair supported progressive candidates.

The DNC isn't the same DNC is was in 2016. Or 2020. Or 2024.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

good then it can be further not like then by kicking shumer and jefferies out of their chairs!

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

Congress makes that decision. If you have a democratic representativenin the house or Senate. Call them. Write them a letter. Go to their local office in your city if you can.

[–] MrNobody@quokk.au 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The current DNC chair supports taking ~~bribes~~ donations from “good billionaires”, it’s the same DNC as always but with a fresh vaneer of progressive ideals.