this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
509 points (70.5% liked)

Memes

45657 readers
641 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Only the wealthy, tiny almost pointless to consider ones. Poor Countries and large Countries have no such infrastructure.

[–] kimpilled@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

China has tons of it.

So does Russia.

Japan isn’t “small” (it’s the length of California) and has tons of it.

The EU is pretty big and all interconnects.

Size isn’t the issue. It certainly hasn’t prevented us from paving half our country.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

China is unmovable by vehicle at all such that their failure of a mass transit system is trying busses on stilts.
Japan is tiny. I mean very tiny minuscule area of land.
Most of EU has no such thing. You are assuming it EU is Germany, France, and Belgium. PS, all the actual Countries (which EU isn't one) in the EU are tiny.
Size is a factor in cost and that is the real reason most Countries have no such thing as viable mass transit for the majority of their citizens. Paving sold cars and cars made corporations lots of money. Mass transit does the opposite and is thus objected to by same corpos.

[–] Sloth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Public transit is cheaper and more accessable. It would be quite easy to make it profitable. Private transportation is more expensive both on the production side and infrastructure side. The auto industry did a lot of scummy shit in order to make it profitable. In the US, they bought up and shut down just about every public transport corp in order to force the public to buy cars and force the state to build infrastructure.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)