this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
207 points (96.0% liked)

Canada

12625 readers
484 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/74351191

A proposed data center in northwestern Alberta could generate dozens of atomic bombs worth of heat every day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bad1080@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

queue the people telling us how little that is in comparison to the energy of the sun... you know what else the sun is doing? making plants grow! can your data center do that? no it does the opposite...

edit: they are already coming out of the woodworks, just with different "arguments"... 🙄

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure, and our planet doesn't need saving. Planets don't just break.

Galaxy brains.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean... You're not wrong. Earth will be fine. It's already had global heating cycles beyond the scale of what we're looking at.

The small, teensy, insignificant problem is that the last time it happened was one of the Great Extinction events that wiped out most live on the planet.

And the heating also happened about 100-1000× more slowly, iirc—over the timescale of millennia, not decades.

But life will survive. And new species will eventually evolve to fill the sparsely populated planet left behind by the disaster.

The Great Filter is coming for us.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You’re not wrong.

I was sarcastically quoting those galaxy brains. Of course they're technically correct, that was my whole point.

I have taken to talking about saving the ecosphere instead.

I'd still prefer to avoid a human made extinction event.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Totally agreed — sorry, I thought it was clear that I understood you were poking fun at them. I was leaning into your sarcasm, but it sounds like I missed conveying that tone!

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

But can your "plants" make an image of my cat in studio ghibli style? Checkmate.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 0 points 3 days ago

It does not do the opposite, no, it provides compute.