this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2026
36 points (82.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

50586 readers
587 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Do some rich people only wear designer clothes? Like, is everything they have in their wardrobe designer, even down to their socks and underwear?

It's a question I've always had.

To clarify, I mean both old money and new money, from high-level millionaires to billionaires. And when I say designer, I mean across the entire spectrum. Not every designer brand is loud and famous like Gucci. What I mean is, do these wealthy people ever buy clothes, underwear, socks, etc., from stores like Walmart, Target, and other regular retailers, or is everything in their wardrobe designer?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

It's not. Chartering over 10K per hour, so a cross-country flight is easily well over 50K. She flies business class and pays like $5K. She can't afford first class, first class alone is like 10K. You really don't know how much those things cost. A tiny yacht is 1.5 million, a medium sized one is closer to 10 million.

You're an order of magnitude off. She doesn't have $50million in cash. It's mostly real estate and stocks. She lives in a 5 million dollar house, but a few miles away people live in houses that are worth like 50 million or more. Bill Gates house is a few miles from them, and it's worth 150 million.

But please lecture me more about how you know more about her life than I do.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How did $50 mil become not so opulent? Thats fifty million dollars. I have 2k in savings, I'm thinking about busing instead of flying. Whatever level I'm picking for airlines is $400-500 nowadays one way.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Would you regard a 1950s run down shack of a house as opulent? I doubt it.

Those cost 3 million dollars where my sister lives. What you are thinking of, big mansions, cost more like $50 million. You are off by a order of magnitude.

My shitty 100 year old two bedroom apartment is worth 700,000 dollars. That doesn't make it opulent. It's just the basic cost of living.

[–] moonshadow@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Brother I consider living indoors opulent, and it sounds like your whole family is late for a guillotine appointment. Talking about how your "shitty" home is "only" worth three quarters of a million dollars is disgustingly entitled and ungrateful, I'm really hoping you aren't real

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

My partner and I dream of affording a $1Mil house on a shared income, you really need to rethink what you consider (or don't consider) wealthy

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 6 points 6 days ago

And the prices of those yachts doesn't take into account the cost of ownership - slip fees, fuel, maintenance, etc.

Owning it costs a lot more, which is true of so many things.

[–] BenevolentOne@infosec.pub 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

People who haven't had the opportunity to see it don't realize that wealth distribution is fractal, and the more money you have, the more obvious this is.

I like to think of it in terms of stack of 300X (I could buy your year in a day's interest) and work your way up.

$1

$300

$90000 < if you're reading this post, you are probably around here.

$27000000 < This is the rich person in the post above, notably still in the middle.

$8100000000 < Private jets, billionaires, there are a few thousand of these.

$2.43E12 < Musks, Bezoses, etc.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I never said I knew more about her life, but please keep putting words in my mouth.

A $50M net worth should absolutely be bringing in $2M/year income which is plenty to charter flights and buy yachts. I never said it had to be chartered trans Atlantic or that it had to be a super yacht.

But sure I guess your poor sister just can't swing the money to fly first class with her measly little $50M. How embarrassing for her. You should clip some coupons for her to get by.

I mean how much do you think you need? Seriously.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You know nothing about money. You sound like someone would sell their house to buy a Ferrari and wonder why they are broke a few years later.

Asset value appreciation is not income. You seem to be under a total delusion she is making 2 million in cash a year. She isn't. They make like 500K in income, and after taxes it's like 300K. Doctors make more than her and her husband do. Do you think a doctor chartering flights?

You are talking about people who have $500 million in assets.

By your logic I should be driving a Lambo, not a Civic.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You have no idea what I know. Anyone with a $50M net worth and I'm assuming that's what you are talking about, that can't generate more than $500k a year, is a friggin moron. It's not hard to believe since she's related to you and there is no real requirement to be smart to be rich. You just have to lack a moral compass.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Right, so she's an idiot for not investing in the slave trade or something now?

I'm blocking you because you're so incredibly wrong and demonistration an absurd amount of ignorance about how finances work.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Oooo, so I guess I can call that a victory!