this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
357 points (95.7% liked)

News

35692 readers
2726 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Highlight:

“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, everything is closed,” Gallant said. “We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Taking and killing hostages are both war crimes.

[–] QHC@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, so war crimes are justified as long as the other side does it first?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Potentially, sure. Things like carpet bombing civilian areas, certain uses of minefields, certain munitions, etc are banned by convention but the thing about the Geneva Conventions are that they are a mutual treaty. Your nation agrees not to do it to other signatories or nations or forces that have otherwise agreed to the limitations as well.

In this case? No. Not at all justified. Hamas might not agree to the Conventions, and thus don't benefit from the protections, but the moment they suspended elections they lost the right to claim they represent the Gaza Strip, even if Israel didn't claim it as territory regardless.

Israel is a signatory of the Conventions, and the Gaza Strip is their claimed land, this is a war crime against people they claim as their own, the actions of what amounts to a domestic terrorist network is irrelevant to whether they can starve people into submission.

A standard genocidal tactic of imperialists everywhere, mind you, from the Irish famine, to the Holodomor, to the Bengal Famines.

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Israel doesn't claim Gaza though

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Fair enough, it's just the rest of the world that says they act like they do whatever they officially claim, while they refuse to recognize everything necessary for Palestine to exist as a functional state.

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Oh most certainly. Palestine as a whole isn't a functional state, just the Gaza Strip (albeit under varying degrees of blockade since Hamas was elected and won the civil war). I'd consider the W.B to be occupied/undergoing a slow process of annexation. I think the most realistic solution for the citizens of the W.B is that they at some point in the future get the option to become Israeli citizens with all the rights (and responsibilities) that entails.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How do you explain the illegal Israeli settlements there then?

[–] Sivalente@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Israel unilaterally removed itself from the gaza strip all most 20 years ago. They only sell infrastructure to the gazan government.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Yes but this particular news story is about Israel publicly announcing a war crime.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

One of these is a state. A state with US military support.

[–] nicoweio@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And war crimes justify war crimes?

[–] Pasta4u@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Murder is against the law in western countries but of someone tries to kill you, you can kill them in self defense.

So yea of someone is committing war crimes against you, you can fo ahead and fight back to get them to stop

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

War crimes are war crimes, doesn't matter if the other side started them first. Israel is stooping just as low as Hamas is with these tactics, you can and should fight in self defense without targeting Civilians

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They don't target civilians. Hamas does.

When you build your headquarters inside a civilian hospital, and that hospital gets bombed, you are to blame for the war crime of positioning your HQ in a civilian hospital, not the person who bombs you.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you build an HQ in a hospital that's (likely? I'd assume so) a war crime. If your opponent then bombs that hospital to bomb you they are also committing a war crime. Some of you are insane, would you agree with the police shooting hostages because "well they took the hostages first, it's their fault we shot them". Fuck no, you'd cry for whoever did that to go to prison. Just because Hamas is stooping so low does not suddenly make it OK for Israel to stoop just about as low.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I only know the war crimes I was taught about that can plausibly be laid on Jews

Yeah I'm aware. Show me on the doll where ((George Soros)) and the ((globalists)) hurt you.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

be laid on Jews

fancy how it always ends up being this according to people defending Israel as rightful. I don't give a shit about Israel being mostly jewish. Should I give them a free war crime pass because they suffered from genocide in the past? That how you think this should work?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't care about your beliefs, because you are largely ignorant of the actual situation. I'm calling out the fact that your information sources are blatantly anti-Semitic.

You're just their rube.

[–] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the real world - sadly, yes.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -1 points 2 years ago

It's legally how the Geneva Conventions work. You are only bound to them if the other side agrees to it as well.

However, Hamas is not the Gaza Strip, it is not Palestine, and Israel claims the Strip as its territory anyways so to claim the civilian population doesn't accept the Convention so they aren't bound by it is ludicrous.