this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
1083 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

88987 readers
2849 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

[...]included a $72 billion accounting charge reflecting an increase in the ⁠estimated value of bonds that could eventually convert into Anthropic shares, rather than cash costs tied to ​its operations, the document said.

So dept isn't cash cost that's tied to operations? All the debt did was finance the operations. Reading this paragraph and you'd wonder: who in the hell issued those bonds in the first place?

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

included a $72 billion accounting charge reflecting an increase in the ⁠estimated value of bonds that could eventually convert into Anthropic shares, rather than cash costs tied to ​its operations

It's a very common way for startups to raise money. In this case, the bond value goes up because of a perceived increase in the value of Anthropic.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Repaying debt is cash cost. But this is convertible debt that could be converted to stock, in which case the holders of those newly converted shares don't get paid cash from the company, but instead own a chunk of the company worth more than that cash. So the conversion itself would alleviate the cash demands of the company, while also diluting the ownership stakes of any preexisting owner. That's what that paragraph means.

Companies issue convertible bonds usually because they can get better interest rates on it, in the event that they need to repay it. Or they're happy to deal with diluting their shares if the company becomes so valuable, because that means they've gotten a lot richer and just have to share their newfound riches with the lender.

[–] tachikoma@lemmy.today -2 points 1 day ago

I'm totally spamming this across the thread with copy/vaste.

Look man I just need a little liquiditiy... 😏 😈